Limitations on Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK: A Critical Analysis

Dr. Syed Raza Shah Gilani, Mr. Ashraf Ali, Ms. Shehla Zahoor
{"title":"Limitations on Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK: A Critical Analysis","authors":"Dr. Syed Raza Shah Gilani, Mr. Ashraf Ali, Ms. Shehla Zahoor","doi":"10.56384/jes.v39i1.288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article aims to discuss some British parliamentary issues that are directly link with the democratic values, power distribution, limitations, overlapping of national laws with the EU laws before Brexit, and restoration of state sovereignty in the post-Brexit UK. Parliamentary Sovereignty is a doctrine where the parliament wields absolute power and can therefore make and unmake laws. Many scholars argue that the doctrine is the central principle in the UK but by weighing its advantages and its disadvantages, one may assume that it can no longer be regarded as the central element of the constitution. The issue of common law radicalism can also be seen as a limitation to parliamentary sovereignty. The paper also discuss some legal issues of translating Parliamentary Acts by courts and judges. Simultaneously an act count valid on certain circumstances but not applicable when it conflicts with other status. \nThis article emphasises on the study of factors that limit the most popular dogma. For instances, the UK entering the European Union in 1973, the Human Rights Act 1998, devolution of power to Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly, the doctrine of implied repeal, common law radicalism and democracy.","PeriodicalId":199460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Studies (JES)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Studies (JES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56384/jes.v39i1.288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article aims to discuss some British parliamentary issues that are directly link with the democratic values, power distribution, limitations, overlapping of national laws with the EU laws before Brexit, and restoration of state sovereignty in the post-Brexit UK. Parliamentary Sovereignty is a doctrine where the parliament wields absolute power and can therefore make and unmake laws. Many scholars argue that the doctrine is the central principle in the UK but by weighing its advantages and its disadvantages, one may assume that it can no longer be regarded as the central element of the constitution. The issue of common law radicalism can also be seen as a limitation to parliamentary sovereignty. The paper also discuss some legal issues of translating Parliamentary Acts by courts and judges. Simultaneously an act count valid on certain circumstances but not applicable when it conflicts with other status. This article emphasises on the study of factors that limit the most popular dogma. For instances, the UK entering the European Union in 1973, the Human Rights Act 1998, devolution of power to Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly, the doctrine of implied repeal, common law radicalism and democracy.
英国议会主权的限制:批判性分析
本文旨在探讨与脱欧前英国的民主价值观、权力分配、限制、国内法与欧盟法的重叠以及脱欧后英国国家主权的恢复等直接相关的英国议会问题。议会主权是一种学说,议会行使绝对权力,因此可以制定和废除法律。许多学者认为该原则是英国的核心原则,但通过权衡其优点和缺点,人们可能会认为它不能再被视为宪法的核心要素。普通法激进主义的问题也可以被视为对议会主权的限制。本文还讨论了法院和法官翻译国会法案的一些法律问题。同时,行为在某些情况下有效,但与其他状态相冲突时不适用。本文着重研究限制最流行的教条的因素。例如,1973年英国加入欧盟、1998年《人权法案》、向苏格兰议会和威尔士议会下放权力、默示废除原则、普通法激进主义和民主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信