Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block versus Conservative Management for Post Dural Puncture Headache in Cesarean Section

Chetan Bohara, R. Maharjan, Subi Regmi, Gunjan Regmi, A. Singh, A. Shrestha
{"title":"Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block versus Conservative Management for Post Dural Puncture Headache in Cesarean Section","authors":"Chetan Bohara, R. Maharjan, Subi Regmi, Gunjan Regmi, A. Singh, A. Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/njhs.v2i1.47158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Post-dural puncture headache is one of the frequently encountered and inevitable post-operative complications of the subarachnoid block. The primary treatment is always considered conservative management in such instances. However, an epidural blood patch remains an invasive gold standard treatment. Sphenopalatine ganglion block is propounded as minimally invasive with prompt and better outcomes.\nObjective: To assess the efficacy of Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) when compared to conservative management based on the onset of analgesia and its duration.\nMethods: This is a prospective study performed on 40 obstetrics patients who underwent Lower segment cesarean section in Lumbini Medical College and Teaching Hospital (LMCTH) who complained of Post dural puncture headache within 7 days. All the parturients are categorized into Group A, those who are treated with sphenopalatine ganglion block, and Group B, where post-dural puncture headache was treated with conservative management. Independent t-tests and Fischer’s test were used for statistical analysis.\nResults: The patients in group A showed positive outcomes where all of them were relieved of post-dural puncture headache within 10 mins after Sphenopalatine ganglion block (p<0.001) and the mean pain score, based on a numerical pain rating scale was less or equal to 4 for the first 8 hours.\nConclusions: Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) could be used as an effective first-line treatment modality in the management of post-dural puncture headache compared to conservative management.","PeriodicalId":384518,"journal":{"name":"Nepal Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepal Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/njhs.v2i1.47158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Post-dural puncture headache is one of the frequently encountered and inevitable post-operative complications of the subarachnoid block. The primary treatment is always considered conservative management in such instances. However, an epidural blood patch remains an invasive gold standard treatment. Sphenopalatine ganglion block is propounded as minimally invasive with prompt and better outcomes. Objective: To assess the efficacy of Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) when compared to conservative management based on the onset of analgesia and its duration. Methods: This is a prospective study performed on 40 obstetrics patients who underwent Lower segment cesarean section in Lumbini Medical College and Teaching Hospital (LMCTH) who complained of Post dural puncture headache within 7 days. All the parturients are categorized into Group A, those who are treated with sphenopalatine ganglion block, and Group B, where post-dural puncture headache was treated with conservative management. Independent t-tests and Fischer’s test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The patients in group A showed positive outcomes where all of them were relieved of post-dural puncture headache within 10 mins after Sphenopalatine ganglion block (p<0.001) and the mean pain score, based on a numerical pain rating scale was less or equal to 4 for the first 8 hours. Conclusions: Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) could be used as an effective first-line treatment modality in the management of post-dural puncture headache compared to conservative management.
剖宫产术后硬脊膜穿刺后头痛蝶腭神经节阻滞与保守治疗
硬膜穿刺后头痛是蛛网膜下腔阻滞术后常见且不可避免的并发症之一。在这种情况下,主要的治疗总是被认为是保守的管理。然而,硬膜外血液贴片仍然是一种侵入性的金标准治疗。蝶腭神经节阻滞被认为是一种微创且及时和更好的结果。目的:根据镇痛的开始时间和持续时间,评价蝶腭神经节阻滞(SPGB)与保守治疗的疗效。方法:对40例在蓝毗尼医学院附属教学医院(LMCTH)行下节段剖宫产术并在术后7天内出现硬膜穿刺后头痛的产科患者进行前瞻性研究。A组采用蝶腭神经节阻滞治疗,B组采用硬脊膜穿刺后头痛保守治疗。采用独立t检验和Fischer检验进行统计分析。结果:A组患者在蝶帕神经节阻滞后10 min内硬脊膜穿刺后头痛均得到缓解(p<0.001),前8 h的平均疼痛评分小于等于4分。结论:与保守治疗相比,蝶腭神经节阻滞(SPGB)可作为治疗硬脊膜穿刺后头痛的有效一线治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信