Machine Learning Techniques for Real-Time Prediction of Essential Rock Properties Whilst Drilling

K. Amadi, M. Alsaba, I. Iyalla, R. Prabhu, R. Elgaddafi
{"title":"Machine Learning Techniques for Real-Time Prediction of Essential Rock Properties Whilst Drilling","authors":"K. Amadi, M. Alsaba, I. Iyalla, R. Prabhu, R. Elgaddafi","doi":"10.2118/217113-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Wellbore instability is the most significant incident during the drilling of production sections of most wells. Common problems such as wellbore collapse, tight hole, mechanical sticking, cause major delays in drilling time due to extended reaming and sidetracking in worst-case scenario. Geomechanical property of rock such as Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) affects wellbore stability, drilling performance and formation in-situ stresses estimation. Conventional methods used to estimate UCS requires either laboratory experiments or derived from sonic logs and the main drawbacks of these methods are the data and samples availability, high costs and time This paper presents an alternative technique of utilizing real-time drilling parameters and machine learning (ML) algorithm in the prediction of UCS thereby enabling timely drilling decisions. ML algorithm enables a system to learn complex pattern from the dataset during the training (learning) phase without any specified mathematical model and afterwards the trained model can predict through a model input. In this work, five ML models were used to predict UCS using offset well data from an already drilled wells. The models include; artificial neural network (ANN), CatBoost (CB), Extra Tree (ET), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The ML models were first trained with 1150 data points using a 70:30 percentage ratio for training and testing the model respectively. After that, 560 datapoints from a different well were used to validate the developed model. The real-time drilling parameters required included weight on bit, penetration rate, rotary speed, and torque. The analysis result revealed good match between the actual and predicted (UCS) with correlation coefficients for training and testing dataset; 0.970 and 0.70 and 0.85 and 0.77 for CatBoost and ANN respectively. The main added value of this approach is that these drilling parameters are readily available in real-time and timely drilling decisions can be modified to improve the drilling performance.","PeriodicalId":407977,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","volume":"683 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217113-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wellbore instability is the most significant incident during the drilling of production sections of most wells. Common problems such as wellbore collapse, tight hole, mechanical sticking, cause major delays in drilling time due to extended reaming and sidetracking in worst-case scenario. Geomechanical property of rock such as Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) affects wellbore stability, drilling performance and formation in-situ stresses estimation. Conventional methods used to estimate UCS requires either laboratory experiments or derived from sonic logs and the main drawbacks of these methods are the data and samples availability, high costs and time This paper presents an alternative technique of utilizing real-time drilling parameters and machine learning (ML) algorithm in the prediction of UCS thereby enabling timely drilling decisions. ML algorithm enables a system to learn complex pattern from the dataset during the training (learning) phase without any specified mathematical model and afterwards the trained model can predict through a model input. In this work, five ML models were used to predict UCS using offset well data from an already drilled wells. The models include; artificial neural network (ANN), CatBoost (CB), Extra Tree (ET), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The ML models were first trained with 1150 data points using a 70:30 percentage ratio for training and testing the model respectively. After that, 560 datapoints from a different well were used to validate the developed model. The real-time drilling parameters required included weight on bit, penetration rate, rotary speed, and torque. The analysis result revealed good match between the actual and predicted (UCS) with correlation coefficients for training and testing dataset; 0.970 and 0.70 and 0.85 and 0.77 for CatBoost and ANN respectively. The main added value of this approach is that these drilling parameters are readily available in real-time and timely drilling decisions can be modified to improve the drilling performance.
钻井过程中实时预测基本岩石特性的机器学习技术
井筒失稳是大多数井生产段钻井过程中最严重的事故。在最坏的情况下,由于扩大扩眼和侧钻,井眼坍塌、井眼紧致、机械卡钻等常见问题会导致钻井时间的严重延迟。岩石的无侧限抗压强度(UCS)等地质力学特性影响着井筒稳定性、钻井性能和地层地应力估算。用于估计UCS的传统方法要么需要实验室实验,要么需要从声波测井中得出,这些方法的主要缺点是数据和样本的可用性、成本和时间高。本文提出了一种利用实时钻井参数和机器学习(ML)算法预测UCS的替代技术,从而能够及时做出钻井决策。ML算法使系统在训练(学习)阶段无需任何指定的数学模型即可从数据集中学习复杂模式,之后训练模型可以通过模型输入进行预测。在这项工作中,使用了5个ML模型来预测UCS,这些模型使用了来自已钻井的邻井数据。模型包括;人工神经网络(ANN)、CatBoost (CB)、Extra Tree (ET)、随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)。ML模型首先使用1150个数据点进行训练,分别使用70:30的百分比比率进行训练和测试模型。之后,使用来自另一口井的560个数据点来验证开发的模型。所需的实时钻井参数包括钻头重量、钻速、转速和扭矩。分析结果表明,训练集和测试集的相关系数与实际预测值(UCS)吻合较好;CatBoost和ANN分别为0.970和0.70,0.85和0.77。该方法的主要附加价值在于,这些钻井参数可以实时获取,并且可以及时修改钻井决策,以提高钻井性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信