{"title":"Comprehensive modeling of VLSI test","authors":"T. Ziaja, E. Swartzlander","doi":"10.1109/DFTVS.1996.572021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predictive models for test traditionally focus on the defect level leaving the test process, while ignoring the Type I error which occurs when the test fails good circuits. This paper presents a general framework for understanding test processes, all of which exhibit both Type I and Type II errors. The application of this framework to published models for test is developed within this general framework, illustrating its usefulness in describing various types of tests. The use of this framework in including the effect of Type I error is then demonstrated and references to its application, including Type I error, to an actual manufacturing test process are provided.","PeriodicalId":199861,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DFTVS.1996.572021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Predictive models for test traditionally focus on the defect level leaving the test process, while ignoring the Type I error which occurs when the test fails good circuits. This paper presents a general framework for understanding test processes, all of which exhibit both Type I and Type II errors. The application of this framework to published models for test is developed within this general framework, illustrating its usefulness in describing various types of tests. The use of this framework in including the effect of Type I error is then demonstrated and references to its application, including Type I error, to an actual manufacturing test process are provided.