{"title":"Abstract C01: Awareness of oral cancer among betel quid users in a high-risk refugee community","authors":"D. DePalo, Lucy L. Shi, E. Bradford, Amy Y. Chen","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-C01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic mastication of betel nut (BN), a psychoactive substance, has been associated with oral cancer. However, BN continues to be used regularly among members of South and Southeast Asian cultures, including within the refugee resettlement area of Clarkston, GA. Our objective is to understand usage patterns of BN in this high-risk refugee population and assess knowledge gaps that may explain this disconnect. Methods: Patients from two clinics in Clarkston, GA were approached for the study. Patients who reported familiarity with BN were administered a survey on BN usage and health awareness; subsequently, an educational brochure was reviewed, and a post-test was administered. Results and frequencies were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA). Results: 48 patients familiar with BN were surveyed. The most common ethnic groups were South (71%) and Southeast Asian (20%). 64.6% reported use themselves and 68.1% reported use by a family member; the average length of use was 3.34 and 15.24 years, respectively (p=0.0041). 42.8% reported social use, 28.6% reported usage during celebrations only, and 28.6% reported daily use. 69.6% reported consuming the nut only in quid form, composed of a mixture of the nut, leaf, spices, and other additives; 10.8% were unaware of the ingredients used. 32.4% reported using BN with tobacco. With regards to addiction, 29.5% reported concern about the habit, 40.9% wished they or their relatives could quit, and 31.8% had tried to quit. Only 13.6% have ever received resources on cessation. In this cohort, 75% believed BN was harmful for health, 9.1% believed it was beneficial, and 15.9% were unsure. The most common reasons cited for harm were teeth discoloration (29.26%), cancer (29.26%), tobacco contents (14.6%), and addiction (14.6%). Only 52.3% in this cohort believed BN alone could cause cancer, while 18.2% did not and 29.5% were unsure. In contrast, 88.6% believed BN with tobacco could cause cancer. Similarly, awareness of oral cancer symptoms was also low; 68.8% recognized cheek pain, 18.8% recognized ear pain, and 70% recognized a picture of tongue cancer. Conclusions: Our study illustrates patterns of BN usage and demonstrates notable knowledge gaps regarding health consequences of BN and oral cancer presentations in a high-risk refugee community. Our findings also highlight a lack of educational resources available to our cohort, despite reported interest in quitting. As recreational BN usage becomes more widespread, community initiatives are important in driving cessation. Citation Format: Danielle K. Depalo, Lucy L. Shi, Ella Bradford, Amy Y. Chen. Awareness of oral cancer among betel quid users in a high-risk refugee community [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C01.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-C01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic mastication of betel nut (BN), a psychoactive substance, has been associated with oral cancer. However, BN continues to be used regularly among members of South and Southeast Asian cultures, including within the refugee resettlement area of Clarkston, GA. Our objective is to understand usage patterns of BN in this high-risk refugee population and assess knowledge gaps that may explain this disconnect. Methods: Patients from two clinics in Clarkston, GA were approached for the study. Patients who reported familiarity with BN were administered a survey on BN usage and health awareness; subsequently, an educational brochure was reviewed, and a post-test was administered. Results and frequencies were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA). Results: 48 patients familiar with BN were surveyed. The most common ethnic groups were South (71%) and Southeast Asian (20%). 64.6% reported use themselves and 68.1% reported use by a family member; the average length of use was 3.34 and 15.24 years, respectively (p=0.0041). 42.8% reported social use, 28.6% reported usage during celebrations only, and 28.6% reported daily use. 69.6% reported consuming the nut only in quid form, composed of a mixture of the nut, leaf, spices, and other additives; 10.8% were unaware of the ingredients used. 32.4% reported using BN with tobacco. With regards to addiction, 29.5% reported concern about the habit, 40.9% wished they or their relatives could quit, and 31.8% had tried to quit. Only 13.6% have ever received resources on cessation. In this cohort, 75% believed BN was harmful for health, 9.1% believed it was beneficial, and 15.9% were unsure. The most common reasons cited for harm were teeth discoloration (29.26%), cancer (29.26%), tobacco contents (14.6%), and addiction (14.6%). Only 52.3% in this cohort believed BN alone could cause cancer, while 18.2% did not and 29.5% were unsure. In contrast, 88.6% believed BN with tobacco could cause cancer. Similarly, awareness of oral cancer symptoms was also low; 68.8% recognized cheek pain, 18.8% recognized ear pain, and 70% recognized a picture of tongue cancer. Conclusions: Our study illustrates patterns of BN usage and demonstrates notable knowledge gaps regarding health consequences of BN and oral cancer presentations in a high-risk refugee community. Our findings also highlight a lack of educational resources available to our cohort, despite reported interest in quitting. As recreational BN usage becomes more widespread, community initiatives are important in driving cessation. Citation Format: Danielle K. Depalo, Lucy L. Shi, Ella Bradford, Amy Y. Chen. Awareness of oral cancer among betel quid users in a high-risk refugee community [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C01.
长期咀嚼槟榔(BN)是一种精神活性物质,与口腔癌有关。然而,BN继续在南亚和东南亚文化的成员中定期使用,包括在佐治亚州克拉克斯顿的难民安置区内。我们的目标是了解BN在这一高危难民人群中的使用模式,并评估可能解释这种脱节的知识差距。方法:来自佐治亚州克拉克斯顿两家诊所的患者进行了研究。报告熟悉BN的患者进行了一项关于BN使用和健康意识的调查;随后,审查了一本教育小册子,并进行了后测。使用Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA)分析结果和频率。结果:对48例熟悉BN的患者进行了调查。最常见的族群是南亚(71%)和东南亚(20%)。64.6%的人报告自己使用,68.1%的人报告家庭成员使用;平均使用时间分别为3.34年和15.24年(p=0.0041)。42.8%的人报告社交使用,28.6%的人报告仅在庆祝期间使用,28.6%的人报告日常使用。69.6%的人报告说,他们只食用坚果的液体形式,由坚果、叶子、香料和其他添加剂组成;10.8%的人不知道所使用的成分。32.4%的人报告将BN与烟草一起使用。在烟瘾方面,29.5%的受访者表示担心烟瘾,40.9%的受访者希望自己或亲戚能够戒烟,31.8%的受访者曾尝试戒烟。只有13.6%的人获得过戒烟资源。在这个队列中,75%的人认为BN对健康有害,9.1%的人认为BN有益,15.9%的人不确定。牙齿变色(29.26%)、癌症(29.26%)、烟草成分(14.6%)、上瘾(14.6%)是最常见的危害原因。该队列中只有52.3%的人认为BN单独致癌,18.2%的人不认为会致癌,29.5%的人不确定。相反,88.6%的人认为BN和烟草会致癌。同样,对口腔癌症状的认识也很低;68.8%的人认出了脸颊疼痛,18.8%的人认出了耳朵疼痛,70%的人认出了舌癌的图片。结论:我们的研究说明了BN的使用模式,并表明在高危难民社区中BN和口腔癌的健康后果方面存在显著的知识差距。我们的研究结果还强调,尽管有报告称有戒烟的兴趣,但我们的研究对象缺乏可用的教育资源。随着娱乐性上网越来越普遍,社区倡议在推动戒烟方面非常重要。引文格式:Danielle K. Depalo, Lucy L. Shi, Ella Bradford, Amy Y. Chen。高危难民社区槟榔液使用者口腔癌认知[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr C01。