Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement

Xiaomei Jian, Peng Wang, Ningning Sun, Wen Xu, Lingxuan Liu, Yichun Ma, Wei‐Qiang Chen
{"title":"Material flow analysis of China’s five commodity plastics urges radical waste infrastructure improvement","authors":"Xiaomei Jian, Peng Wang, Ningning Sun, Wen Xu, Lingxuan Liu, Yichun Ma, Wei‐Qiang Chen","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plastic waste is one of the most pressing global environmental challenges. As the world’s largest plastic waste generator and importer, China has implemented various policies to promote sustainable plastic waste management. However, the quantitative understanding of China’s application-specific plastic waste recycling and its infrastructure development is still quite limited. Here, we build up a unified framework to investigate the recycling and the corresponding infrastructure status of five commodity plastics in China, which are polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PE, PP, PVC, PS, ABS) from 2000–2019. We find that: (1) in total, China consumed around 981.4 million tons (Mt) of the five commodity plastics from 2000–2019, generating 590.4 Mt of plastic waste, only 27% of which was recycled, 34% was landfilled and 32% was incinerated; (2) PP (∼30%) and PE (∼28%) have the highest recycling rate in China, which is related to their huge consumption base, while PS and ABS have the lowest recycling rate at only ∼26%; (3) the waste recycling performance is determined by its applications, and the worst recycling rates (<20%) are the packaging and commodity sectors due to their poor collection, while higher recycling rates (⩾30%) are found in the building and construction, agriculture and transportation sectors due to the special waste collection systems in these sectors; (4) our further examination of the recycling potential reveals that around 56% of packaging waste can be recycled by adjusting waste management infrastructure (in the collection, pre- and end-processing). Our results can help bridge information gaps and support policymaking to improve sustainable plastic waste management.","PeriodicalId":309041,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ac5642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plastic waste is one of the most pressing global environmental challenges. As the world’s largest plastic waste generator and importer, China has implemented various policies to promote sustainable plastic waste management. However, the quantitative understanding of China’s application-specific plastic waste recycling and its infrastructure development is still quite limited. Here, we build up a unified framework to investigate the recycling and the corresponding infrastructure status of five commodity plastics in China, which are polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (PE, PP, PVC, PS, ABS) from 2000–2019. We find that: (1) in total, China consumed around 981.4 million tons (Mt) of the five commodity plastics from 2000–2019, generating 590.4 Mt of plastic waste, only 27% of which was recycled, 34% was landfilled and 32% was incinerated; (2) PP (∼30%) and PE (∼28%) have the highest recycling rate in China, which is related to their huge consumption base, while PS and ABS have the lowest recycling rate at only ∼26%; (3) the waste recycling performance is determined by its applications, and the worst recycling rates (<20%) are the packaging and commodity sectors due to their poor collection, while higher recycling rates (⩾30%) are found in the building and construction, agriculture and transportation sectors due to the special waste collection systems in these sectors; (4) our further examination of the recycling potential reveals that around 56% of packaging waste can be recycled by adjusting waste management infrastructure (in the collection, pre- and end-processing). Our results can help bridge information gaps and support policymaking to improve sustainable plastic waste management.
中国五大商品塑料的物料流分析敦促彻底改善废物基础设施
塑料垃圾是全球最紧迫的环境挑战之一。作为世界上最大的塑料废物产生国和进口国,中国已经实施了各种政策来促进可持续的塑料废物管理。然而,对中国特定用途的塑料废物回收及其基础设施发展的定量了解仍然相当有限。在此,我们建立了一个统一的框架,调查了2000-2019年中国五种商品塑料(聚乙烯、聚丙烯、聚氯乙烯、聚苯乙烯和丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(PE、PP、PVC、PS、ABS)的回收和相应的基础设施状况。研究发现:(1)从2000年到2019年,中国共消耗了约9.814亿吨商品塑料,产生了5.904亿吨塑料垃圾,其中只有27%被回收利用,34%被填埋,32%被焚烧;(2) PP(~ 30%)和PE(~ 28%)在中国的回收率最高,这与其巨大的消费基础有关,而PS和ABS的回收率最低,仅为~ 26%;(3)废物回收性能由其应用决定,由于收集不良,最差的回收率(<20%)是包装和商品部门,而由于这些部门的特殊废物收集系统,在建筑和建筑、农业和运输部门中发现了更高的回收率(小于30%);(4)我们对回收潜力的进一步研究表明,通过调整废物管理基础设施(收集、预处理和最终处理),约56%的包装废物可以回收利用。我们的研究结果可以帮助弥合信息差距,支持政策制定,以改善可持续的塑料废物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信