التوجه نحو الهدف وعلاقته بأساليب التعلم لدى طلبة كليتي التربية للعلوم الصرفة والإنسانية في جامعة الموصل

رافع ادريس عبد الغفور, حنين عبدالكريم قاسم
{"title":"التوجه نحو الهدف وعلاقته بأساليب التعلم لدى طلبة كليتي التربية للعلوم الصرفة والإنسانية في جامعة الموصل","authors":"رافع ادريس عبد الغفور, حنين عبدالكريم قاسم","doi":"10.51424/ishq.31.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to identify the level of goal orientation among students of the Colleges of Education for Pure Sciences and Humanities at the significance level of 0.05, as well as to identify the differences in statistical significance at the level of 0.05 between the average degrees of goal orientation according to the variables: College of Education for Sciences (Pure and Humanities), the second and fourth grades ) and gender (males and females), as well as identifying the learning methods followed by the students of the study sample and identifying the statistical significance at the level of 0.05 for the relationship between goal-orientation and learning methods among the students of the study sample, as the study sample amounted to (363) male and female students from the Colleges of Education for Pure and Humanities Sciences .The goal-orientation scale was built based on the goal theory and theoretical frameworks, as it was relied on the classification of goal patterns by Elliot, McGregor and Gibbels (1999) and formulating the special paragraphs for each type of goals and patterns of goals (mastery-performance, mastery-sizes, performance-foot, performance- sizes) as (10) was formulated. Paragraphs for the first type of objectives, the second type (8), the third type (6) paragraphs, and the fourth type (6) paragraphs. Thus, the tool consisted of (30) paragraphs, and (3) paragraphs were excluded from statistical analysis because they were undistinguished, and thus the scale consisted of (27) paragraphs, and its apparent sincerity was verified, and the percentage of agreement was (95%) and it reached a stability coefficient. Its stability (85%), and it was also relied on a tool to measure learning methods (for Al-Sanawi, 2013) and applied to university students, and its apparent validity was verified, and the percentage of agreement reached (100%) and its stability coefficient reached (80%), and the data were treated by using statistical methods: Cranach’s alpha equation and Pearson's stability correlation coefficient Point Passerial and the T-test for one sample and for two independent samples, and the results showed that the students of the study sample had positive orientations towards the goals (mastery-performance) and (performance-foot) and negative orientations towards the goals (performance-sizes) and (mastery-sizes), while it did not appear Statistically significant difference for the level of goal orientation according to the college variable (pureand humanities), the academic grade (second and fourth) and gender (males and females), while it appeared that the students relied on the visual method with a higher percentage than the verbal, the practical method higher than the contemplative, the sequential method higher than the total, and the sensory method higher than the intuitive, and there was no relationship between Any average for trends towards. The goal and learning methods of the students, or in the direction towards the goal of performance-action, the visual-verbal style, the goal of performance-action and the practical-reflective style, it showed the existence of a positive relationship, and in light of the results of the study, the researcher came up with a set of recommendations, including the establishment of counseling courses for students on how to direct them towards the goal and the importance of observing the goal and learning methods. Complementary proposals for study were formulated. Keywords: goal orientation, learning styles.","PeriodicalId":348768,"journal":{"name":"Journal Ishraqat Tanmawya","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Ishraqat Tanmawya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51424/ishq.31.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the level of goal orientation among students of the Colleges of Education for Pure Sciences and Humanities at the significance level of 0.05, as well as to identify the differences in statistical significance at the level of 0.05 between the average degrees of goal orientation according to the variables: College of Education for Sciences (Pure and Humanities), the second and fourth grades ) and gender (males and females), as well as identifying the learning methods followed by the students of the study sample and identifying the statistical significance at the level of 0.05 for the relationship between goal-orientation and learning methods among the students of the study sample, as the study sample amounted to (363) male and female students from the Colleges of Education for Pure and Humanities Sciences .The goal-orientation scale was built based on the goal theory and theoretical frameworks, as it was relied on the classification of goal patterns by Elliot, McGregor and Gibbels (1999) and formulating the special paragraphs for each type of goals and patterns of goals (mastery-performance, mastery-sizes, performance-foot, performance- sizes) as (10) was formulated. Paragraphs for the first type of objectives, the second type (8), the third type (6) paragraphs, and the fourth type (6) paragraphs. Thus, the tool consisted of (30) paragraphs, and (3) paragraphs were excluded from statistical analysis because they were undistinguished, and thus the scale consisted of (27) paragraphs, and its apparent sincerity was verified, and the percentage of agreement was (95%) and it reached a stability coefficient. Its stability (85%), and it was also relied on a tool to measure learning methods (for Al-Sanawi, 2013) and applied to university students, and its apparent validity was verified, and the percentage of agreement reached (100%) and its stability coefficient reached (80%), and the data were treated by using statistical methods: Cranach’s alpha equation and Pearson's stability correlation coefficient Point Passerial and the T-test for one sample and for two independent samples, and the results showed that the students of the study sample had positive orientations towards the goals (mastery-performance) and (performance-foot) and negative orientations towards the goals (performance-sizes) and (mastery-sizes), while it did not appear Statistically significant difference for the level of goal orientation according to the college variable (pureand humanities), the academic grade (second and fourth) and gender (males and females), while it appeared that the students relied on the visual method with a higher percentage than the verbal, the practical method higher than the contemplative, the sequential method higher than the total, and the sensory method higher than the intuitive, and there was no relationship between Any average for trends towards. The goal and learning methods of the students, or in the direction towards the goal of performance-action, the visual-verbal style, the goal of performance-action and the practical-reflective style, it showed the existence of a positive relationship, and in light of the results of the study, the researcher came up with a set of recommendations, including the establishment of counseling courses for students on how to direct them towards the goal and the importance of observing the goal and learning methods. Complementary proposals for study were formulated. Keywords: goal orientation, learning styles.
面向目标及其与摩苏尔大学纯粹主义和人文教育系学生学习方法的关系
本研究旨在在0.05的显著性水平下识别纯理学院和人文学院学生的目标取向水平,并根据以下变量确定目标取向平均程度在0.05的显著性水平下的差异:科学教育学院(纯人文),二年级和四年级)和性别(男、女),以及识别研究样本学生遵循的学习方法,并识别研究样本学生的目标取向与学习方法之间的关系在0.05水平上具有统计学意义。为研究样本达(363)男性和女性学生的大学教育纯和人文科学,目标取向量表是建立基于目标理论和理论框架,因为它是由艾略特依靠目标模式的分类,麦格雷戈和Gibbels(1999)和制定目标和模式的特殊段落为每种类型的目标(mastery-performance, mastery-sizes、performance-foot、性能-大小)(10)制定。第一类目标的段落,第二类(8),第三类(6)段落,第四类(6)段落。因此,该工具由(30)个段落组成,(3)个段落因无法区分而被排除在统计分析之外,因此量表由(27)个段落组成,其表观诚意得到验证,一致性百分比为(95%),达到稳定系数。它的稳定性(85%),并依靠一种测量学习方法的工具(for Al-Sanawi, 2013)应用于大学生,验证了它的表观效度,达到了100%的一致性百分比和80%的稳定性系数,并使用统计方法处理数据:对一个样本和两个独立样本进行了Point Passerial和t检验,结果表明,研究样本的学生对目标(精通-绩效)和(绩效-脚)有积极的倾向,对目标(成绩-尺寸)和(掌握-尺寸)有消极的倾向。而在大学变量(纯、人文)、学业等级(二、四年级)、性别(男女)的目标取向水平上,均未出现统计学上的显著差异,但学生对视觉法的依赖比例高于口头法,对实践法的依赖比例高于沉思法,对顺序法的依赖比例高于总体法,对感觉法的依赖比例高于直觉法。趋势的任何平均值之间没有关系。学生的目标和学习方法,或者在朝着行为-行动目标的方向,视觉-言语风格,行为-行动目标和实践-反思风格,都表现出了正相关关系的存在,并且根据研究结果,研究者提出了一组建议:包括辅导课程的设置如何引导学生走向目标以及观察目标的重要性和学习方法。提出了补充研究建议。关键词:目标导向,学习风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信