Superior Contractor Performance: a Barrier to Lean Construction Adoption in Australia

M. Stevens
{"title":"Superior Contractor Performance: a Barrier to Lean Construction Adoption in Australia","authors":"M. Stevens","doi":"10.24928/2022/0157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian construction industry produces twice as much value per dollar while enduring four times the competition than manufacturing. Impressively, this sector outpaces six of nine major industries in the country. However, their quantitative success may dampen Lean Construction's adoption, hurting the industry long-term. Practices significantly transform the value of the inputs, and contractors do it better than manufacturing. However, the industry is much riskier than manufacturing, so contractors hesitate to change to new ones quickly. It appears that organisations will not rapidly adopt Lean's methodology partially due to the success and risk of the Australian construction Industry. This paper proposes a survey methodology of practices to convince contractors of Lean Construction’s improvement potential. Obviously, they should search wherever there may be promising methods. However, this research outlines a straightforward process to validate valuable practices that can be executed internally in the industry and clarify practices' value and timely completion. The aim is to convince already superior performing contractors to see the LC approach as a competitive opportunity.","PeriodicalId":111246,"journal":{"name":"Proc. 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2022/0157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Australian construction industry produces twice as much value per dollar while enduring four times the competition than manufacturing. Impressively, this sector outpaces six of nine major industries in the country. However, their quantitative success may dampen Lean Construction's adoption, hurting the industry long-term. Practices significantly transform the value of the inputs, and contractors do it better than manufacturing. However, the industry is much riskier than manufacturing, so contractors hesitate to change to new ones quickly. It appears that organisations will not rapidly adopt Lean's methodology partially due to the success and risk of the Australian construction Industry. This paper proposes a survey methodology of practices to convince contractors of Lean Construction’s improvement potential. Obviously, they should search wherever there may be promising methods. However, this research outlines a straightforward process to validate valuable practices that can be executed internally in the industry and clarify practices' value and timely completion. The aim is to convince already superior performing contractors to see the LC approach as a competitive opportunity.
卓越承包商绩效:澳大利亚精益建筑采用的障碍
澳大利亚建筑业每一美元创造的价值是制造业的两倍,而承受的竞争是制造业的四倍。令人印象深刻的是,这个行业超过了该国九个主要行业中的六个。然而,他们在数量上的成功可能会抑制精益建筑的采用,长期损害行业。实践显著地改变了投入的价值,承包商比制造业做得更好。然而,这个行业的风险比制造业大得多,因此承包商对迅速更换新产品犹豫不决。由于澳大利亚建筑行业的成功和风险,组织似乎不会迅速采用精益的方法。本文提出了一种实践调查方法,以说服承包商精益建设的改进潜力。显然,他们应该寻找任何可能有前途的方法。然而,本研究概述了一个简单的过程,以验证可以在行业内部执行的有价值的实践,并阐明实践的价值和及时完成。其目的是说服已经表现优异的承包商将LC方法视为竞争机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书