{"title":"17. Transparency and consumer trust in scientific assessments under European food law","authors":"A. D. Boer","doi":"10.3920/978-90-8686-885-8_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European food law is a newly developing field in which different branches of law come together. The field is however also unmistakably linked with nutritional sciences, in requesting scientific evidence to ensure safety and benefits of foodstuffs. The risk analysis cycle introduced in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, ensures that scientific information – regarding i.a. the safety of a product – is independently and transparently assessed by risk assessors who are not involved in the final political risk management decision, in which this scientific information is used to allow such a product on the market. The European Food Safety Authority’s mission as assessor is to independently and transparently conduct risk assessments, which are published in scientific opinions. Transparency of both the procedure and of the Authority’s role, key in these assessments, are however two of the shortcomings identified in the evaluation of the Regulation 178/2002 that was conducted recently. In a proposed update of the Regulation, transparency of risk assessment is therefore one of the main aspects to be improved. This originates from the understanding that such improved transparency of the European food safety system will result in increased consumer trust. After shorty reviewing the development of European food law and the proposed adjustments to the framework regulation, this chapter shows that the concept of transparency, mostly understood as increasing the availability of information, requires to be further specified to ensure it actually contributes to consumer trust. The proposed adjustments to the Regulation 178/2002 are expected to increase information availability, whilst improved risk communication strategies might aid in establishing consumer trust. Further specifying the concept of transparency will result in an increased understanding of how to operationalise it and how transparency can contribute to increasing consumer trust.","PeriodicalId":136087,"journal":{"name":"European Institute for Food Law series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Institute for Food Law series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-885-8_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
European food law is a newly developing field in which different branches of law come together. The field is however also unmistakably linked with nutritional sciences, in requesting scientific evidence to ensure safety and benefits of foodstuffs. The risk analysis cycle introduced in Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, ensures that scientific information – regarding i.a. the safety of a product – is independently and transparently assessed by risk assessors who are not involved in the final political risk management decision, in which this scientific information is used to allow such a product on the market. The European Food Safety Authority’s mission as assessor is to independently and transparently conduct risk assessments, which are published in scientific opinions. Transparency of both the procedure and of the Authority’s role, key in these assessments, are however two of the shortcomings identified in the evaluation of the Regulation 178/2002 that was conducted recently. In a proposed update of the Regulation, transparency of risk assessment is therefore one of the main aspects to be improved. This originates from the understanding that such improved transparency of the European food safety system will result in increased consumer trust. After shorty reviewing the development of European food law and the proposed adjustments to the framework regulation, this chapter shows that the concept of transparency, mostly understood as increasing the availability of information, requires to be further specified to ensure it actually contributes to consumer trust. The proposed adjustments to the Regulation 178/2002 are expected to increase information availability, whilst improved risk communication strategies might aid in establishing consumer trust. Further specifying the concept of transparency will result in an increased understanding of how to operationalise it and how transparency can contribute to increasing consumer trust.
欧洲食品法是一个新发展的领域,不同的法律分支融合在一起。然而,该领域也与营养科学有着明确的联系,需要科学证据来确保食品的安全性和益处。在法规(EC) No 178/2002中引入的风险分析周期确保了科学信息——关于产品的安全性——由不参与最终政治风险管理决策的风险评估人员独立和透明地评估,其中这些科学信息被用于允许此类产品上市。作为评估者,欧洲食品安全局的任务是独立、透明地进行风险评估,评估结果以科学观点的形式发表。然而,在最近进行的对第178/2002号法规的评估中,程序和监管机构角色的透明度是这些评估的关键,这是发现的两个缺陷。因此,在建议更新的规例中,风险评估的透明度是需要改善的主要方面之一。这源于这样一种理解,即提高欧洲食品安全体系的透明度将增加消费者的信任。在简要回顾了欧洲食品法的发展和对框架法规的拟议调整之后,本章表明,透明度的概念,主要被理解为增加信息的可用性,需要进一步规定,以确保它实际上有助于消费者的信任。对第178/2002号规例的拟议调整预计将增加信息的可用性,同时改进风险沟通策略可能有助于建立消费者的信任。进一步明确透明度的概念将有助于加深对如何实施透明度以及透明度如何有助于增加消费者信任的理解。