Efficacy And Safety Evaluation Of A Dry Powder Inhaler Containing Salmeterol Xinafoate 25 Mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 250 Mcg In Subjects With Asthma: A Randomized, Open Label, Comparative, Active Controlled, Parallel Groups, And Multi-Centric Study.

S. Bardapurkar, H. Dumra, V. Karkhanis, V. Chandarana, Amir M. Khoja, N. Prasad, R. Bhagat, Ajay Keni, Nitin Joshi B. Pharm Mumbai, Shravanti Bhowmik M.D. Mumbai
{"title":"Efficacy And Safety Evaluation Of A Dry Powder Inhaler Containing Salmeterol Xinafoate 25 Mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 250 Mcg In Subjects With Asthma: A Randomized, Open Label, Comparative, Active Controlled, Parallel Groups, And Multi-Centric Study.","authors":"S. Bardapurkar, H. Dumra, V. Karkhanis, V. Chandarana, Amir M. Khoja, N. Prasad, R. Bhagat, Ajay Keni, Nitin Joshi B. Pharm Mumbai, Shravanti Bhowmik M.D. Mumbai","doi":"10.5580/22b1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dry powder inhalers have now an established role in inhalation therapy with wide variation in design characteristics impacting their suitability for use in different patient populations. SPARC device structure enables higher amount of the inhaled drug to be delivered to lungs, making possible a reduction in administered dose. Objective: This study was planned to compare efficacy and safety of SPARC device containing Salmeterol 25 mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 250 mcg with Seretide Accuhaler (GSK) containing Salmeterol 50 mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 500 mcg. Methods: This was a 4-week, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study (N= 113) of patients aged 1860 years with asthma, reversible bronchial obstruction, and FEV1 4080% of the predicted normal. After washout from ongoing asthma treatments, there was a 2-week run-in period when patients were permitted use of rescue medication (Salbutamol metered dose inhaler). Patients who successfully competed the run-in period with FEV1 4080% of the predicted normal were randomized 1:1 to SPARC device or Seretide Accuhaler ® for a 4week treatment period. Patients received twice daily inhalation between 8.00 a.m. to 10.00 a.m. and between 8.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. with approximately 12 hour interval between the two doses.Results: The improvements in SPARC device group (S/FP 25/250 mcg) were similar to Seretide Accuhaler group (S/FP 50/500 mcg). The FEV1 increased by 9.73% of predicted normal value in test group and 7.82% in reference group after 4-weeks of treatment. Although the S/FP 25/250 mcg group showed a trend towards more improvement than S/FP 50/500 mcg group in evening peak expiratory flow rate, all differences in subjective and objective outcome measures were not statistically significant. None of the safety measures included in this study showed important clinical differences between treatments. Conclusion: Administered at half the dose of Seretide Accuhaler, the efficacy of Sun device is not statistically significantly different on efficacy parameters evaluated.","PeriodicalId":161194,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/22b1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dry powder inhalers have now an established role in inhalation therapy with wide variation in design characteristics impacting their suitability for use in different patient populations. SPARC device structure enables higher amount of the inhaled drug to be delivered to lungs, making possible a reduction in administered dose. Objective: This study was planned to compare efficacy and safety of SPARC device containing Salmeterol 25 mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 250 mcg with Seretide Accuhaler (GSK) containing Salmeterol 50 mcg/Fluticasone Propionate 500 mcg. Methods: This was a 4-week, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study (N= 113) of patients aged 1860 years with asthma, reversible bronchial obstruction, and FEV1 4080% of the predicted normal. After washout from ongoing asthma treatments, there was a 2-week run-in period when patients were permitted use of rescue medication (Salbutamol metered dose inhaler). Patients who successfully competed the run-in period with FEV1 4080% of the predicted normal were randomized 1:1 to SPARC device or Seretide Accuhaler ® for a 4week treatment period. Patients received twice daily inhalation between 8.00 a.m. to 10.00 a.m. and between 8.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. with approximately 12 hour interval between the two doses.Results: The improvements in SPARC device group (S/FP 25/250 mcg) were similar to Seretide Accuhaler group (S/FP 50/500 mcg). The FEV1 increased by 9.73% of predicted normal value in test group and 7.82% in reference group after 4-weeks of treatment. Although the S/FP 25/250 mcg group showed a trend towards more improvement than S/FP 50/500 mcg group in evening peak expiratory flow rate, all differences in subjective and objective outcome measures were not statistically significant. None of the safety measures included in this study showed important clinical differences between treatments. Conclusion: Administered at half the dose of Seretide Accuhaler, the efficacy of Sun device is not statistically significantly different on efficacy parameters evaluated.
含有25微克沙美特罗/ 250微克丙酸氟替卡松的干粉吸入器对哮喘患者的疗效和安全性评价:一项随机、开放标签、比较、主动对照、平行组和多中心研究
背景:干粉吸入器现在已经在吸入治疗中发挥了既定的作用,但在设计特征上存在很大差异,影响了它们在不同患者群体中的适用性。SPARC装置的结构使吸入的药物能够更大量地输送到肺部,从而可以减少给药剂量。目的:比较沙美特罗25 mcg/丙酸氟替卡松250 mcg的SPARC装置与沙美特罗50 mcg/丙酸氟替卡松500 mcg的舒利泰Accuhaler (GSK)的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项为期4周的随机、开放标签、主动对照、多中心研究(N= 113),患者年龄为1860岁,哮喘,可逆性支气管阻塞,FEV1为预测正常值的4080%。在持续哮喘治疗的洗脱期后,有2周的磨合期,允许患者使用抢救药物(沙丁胺醇计量吸入器)。在磨合期FEV1达到预期正常值的4080%的患者按1:1的比例随机分配到SPARC设备或Seretide Accuhaler®进行为期4周的治疗。患者在上午8点至上午10点和晚上8点至晚上10点之间每天吸入两次,两次剂量之间间隔约12小时。结果:SPARC装置组(S/FP 25/250 mcg)与舒利泰Accuhaler组(S/FP 50/500 mcg)改善相似。治疗4周后,试验组FEV1较预测正常值提高9.73%,对照组提高7.82%。虽然S/FP 25/250 mcg组比S/FP 50/500 mcg组在晚呼气峰流速方面有更大的改善趋势,但主观和客观结局指标的差异均无统计学意义。在这项研究中,没有一项安全措施显示出治疗之间的重要临床差异。结论:在西瑞泰阿舒哈勒的一半剂量下,Sun装置在疗效参数评价上的差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信