Accuracy of Digital Models in Bolton Analysis for Angle Class I Malocclusion Group

Ibrahim M. Abd-elgawad, M. Shamaa, A. Fouda
{"title":"Accuracy of Digital Models in Bolton Analysis for Angle Class I Malocclusion Group","authors":"Ibrahim M. Abd-elgawad, M. Shamaa, A. Fouda","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2022.259771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Objective: This study aimed to test the accuracy and reliability of measurements using digital models versus plaster models. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients were recruited in the study. Impressions were taken for all patients by alginate impression material and poured immediately using certain dental plaster with good dimensional accuracy and surface details reproduction. All casts were trimmed and polished for obtaining high quality study models. Bolton analysis was done by manual and digital techniques for all casts. Intra-operator reliability testing and Paired-samples t-tests was used to compare the measurements within groups. Results: There was an excellent intra-operator reliability for both techniques for manual and digital measurements of teeth width (ICC values are 0.998 and 0.987, respectively). paired-samples t-test for overall ratios by both techniques showed no significant difference (p value is 0.139). Conclusions: Measurements made from digital models are accurate and reliable as manual measurements.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2022.259771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Objective: This study aimed to test the accuracy and reliability of measurements using digital models versus plaster models. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients were recruited in the study. Impressions were taken for all patients by alginate impression material and poured immediately using certain dental plaster with good dimensional accuracy and surface details reproduction. All casts were trimmed and polished for obtaining high quality study models. Bolton analysis was done by manual and digital techniques for all casts. Intra-operator reliability testing and Paired-samples t-tests was used to compare the measurements within groups. Results: There was an excellent intra-operator reliability for both techniques for manual and digital measurements of teeth width (ICC values are 0.998 and 0.987, respectively). paired-samples t-test for overall ratios by both techniques showed no significant difference (p value is 0.139). Conclusions: Measurements made from digital models are accurate and reliable as manual measurements.
角度I类错牙合组博尔顿分析数字模型的准确性
目的:本研究旨在测试数字模型与石膏模型测量的准确性和可靠性。材料与方法:本研究共招募30例患者。所有患者均采用海藻酸盐印模材料进行印模,并立即使用一定的牙石膏浇筑,具有良好的尺寸精度和表面细节再现。所有铸件都经过修整和抛光,以获得高质量的研究模型。所有铸型均采用人工和数字技术进行博尔顿分析。使用操作员内信度检验和配对样本t检验来比较组内测量值。结果:手工和数字测量牙齿宽度的技术在操作者内部具有良好的可靠性(ICC值分别为0.998和0.987)。两种方法对总比值进行配对样本t检验,差异无统计学意义(p值为0.139)。结论:与人工测量相比,数字模型测量准确可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信