Black Atlantic Republicans and the Limits of the Plantation

Jean-Marc Pruit
{"title":"Black Atlantic Republicans and the Limits of the Plantation","authors":"Jean-Marc Pruit","doi":"10.1353/jhs.2022.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article engages with two bodies of literature—the interdisciplinary studies of the Haitian Revolution and republican political theory—to make two corresponding interventions. First, I show how, despite republican political philosophy’s exclusion of the slave from the practice of freedom, Haitian revolutionaries and radical abolitionists—whom I call Black Atlantic Republicans—challenged this exclusion using republican logic. To make this point, I engage with shared understandings of tyranny and domination in David Walker’s Appeal and Toussaint Louverture’s personal correspondence. Second, using Jean Casimir’s notion of the counter-plantation system and Louverture’s proclamations on labor, I argue that despite the Black Atlantic universalization of republican freedom, the ideology fails to properly theorize the domination inherent to plantation labor. This inability to theorize labor freedom, I claim, is endemic to republican political thought itself. We can arrive at this insight by centering the revolutionary Haitian masses rather than their leadership.","PeriodicalId":137704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Haitian Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Haitian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhs.2022.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article engages with two bodies of literature—the interdisciplinary studies of the Haitian Revolution and republican political theory—to make two corresponding interventions. First, I show how, despite republican political philosophy’s exclusion of the slave from the practice of freedom, Haitian revolutionaries and radical abolitionists—whom I call Black Atlantic Republicans—challenged this exclusion using republican logic. To make this point, I engage with shared understandings of tyranny and domination in David Walker’s Appeal and Toussaint Louverture’s personal correspondence. Second, using Jean Casimir’s notion of the counter-plantation system and Louverture’s proclamations on labor, I argue that despite the Black Atlantic universalization of republican freedom, the ideology fails to properly theorize the domination inherent to plantation labor. This inability to theorize labor freedom, I claim, is endemic to republican political thought itself. We can arrive at this insight by centering the revolutionary Haitian masses rather than their leadership.
大西洋黑人共和党人和种植园的限制
摘要:本文结合海地革命的跨学科研究和共和政治理论这两个文献体系,进行了两个相应的干预。首先,我展示了尽管共和政治哲学将奴隶排除在自由实践之外,海地革命者和激进的废奴主义者——我称之为黑大西洋共和党人——是如何用共和逻辑挑战这种排除的。为了说明这一点,我在大卫·沃克的《呼吁》和杜桑·卢维杜尔的私人信件中探讨了对暴政和统治的共同理解。其次,利用让·卡西米尔的反种植园制度概念和卢维杜尔关于劳工的宣言,我认为,尽管共和自由在黑大西洋的普遍化,但这种意识形态未能正确地将种植园劳动力固有的统治理论化。我认为,无法将劳动自由理论化是共和政治思想本身所特有的。我们可以通过以革命的海地群众为中心而不是以他们的领导层为中心来获得这一见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信