Needs Assessment of Anatomy for the Gastroenterology Masters Course among Teachers, Practitioners and Students: Coverage of Topics other than Topographic Anatomy

M. Ayub, K. Shamim, Nahid Shahana
{"title":"Needs Assessment of Anatomy for the Gastroenterology Masters Course among Teachers, Practitioners and Students: Coverage of Topics other than Topographic Anatomy","authors":"M. Ayub, K. Shamim, Nahid Shahana","doi":"10.3329/BJA.V11I2.20672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Absence of formally specified course content and objectives, instructional methodology, and assessment system for Anatomy in the MD Gastroenterology course of Bangladesh has led to confusion in the implementation of its residency curriculum with respect to Anatomy. Needs assessment of Anatomy for the would-be gastroenterologists among the stakeholders of the course would help solving this problem. This study aimed at having feedback on the coverage of topics of Anatomy other than topographic anatomy in teaching and assessment of the MD Gastroenterology course attended by them. Materials & Methods: A Cross-Sectional study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka from July 2002 to December 2003. A questionnaire (based on analysis of a textbook of Gastroenterology) with close-ended questions was sent to nine teachers/practitioners, students (residents) and thesis part students of the MD Gastroenterology course. Results: The number of topics that were felt to covered ‘as required’ by majority of the participants was 2 out of 11. For the most of the topics, teaching or assessment was felt to be ‘more than required’. Though more than 70% respondents considered the course as customized and 75% tended to agree that teaching and assessment had been useful in clinical work, 55.6% thought that it had catered more recall-level knowledge, 85% did not think that a ‘problem-based approach’ had been taken in the course. Conclusion: Considering the findings of this study positive steps can be taken to reorganize of Anatomyportion of the course and making it clinically to the gastroenterologists. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bja.v11i2.20672 Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy, July 2013, Vol. 11 No. 2 pp 62-67","PeriodicalId":284932,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/BJA.V11I2.20672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Absence of formally specified course content and objectives, instructional methodology, and assessment system for Anatomy in the MD Gastroenterology course of Bangladesh has led to confusion in the implementation of its residency curriculum with respect to Anatomy. Needs assessment of Anatomy for the would-be gastroenterologists among the stakeholders of the course would help solving this problem. This study aimed at having feedback on the coverage of topics of Anatomy other than topographic anatomy in teaching and assessment of the MD Gastroenterology course attended by them. Materials & Methods: A Cross-Sectional study was carried out in the Department of Anatomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka from July 2002 to December 2003. A questionnaire (based on analysis of a textbook of Gastroenterology) with close-ended questions was sent to nine teachers/practitioners, students (residents) and thesis part students of the MD Gastroenterology course. Results: The number of topics that were felt to covered ‘as required’ by majority of the participants was 2 out of 11. For the most of the topics, teaching or assessment was felt to be ‘more than required’. Though more than 70% respondents considered the course as customized and 75% tended to agree that teaching and assessment had been useful in clinical work, 55.6% thought that it had catered more recall-level knowledge, 85% did not think that a ‘problem-based approach’ had been taken in the course. Conclusion: Considering the findings of this study positive steps can be taken to reorganize of Anatomyportion of the course and making it clinically to the gastroenterologists. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bja.v11i2.20672 Bangladesh Journal of Anatomy, July 2013, Vol. 11 No. 2 pp 62-67
胃肠病学硕士课程对教师、从业人员和学生的解剖学需求评估:地形解剖学以外的主题
背景:孟加拉国胃肠病学医学博士课程中解剖学缺乏正式规定的课程内容和目标、教学方法和评估体系,这导致了解剖学住院医师课程实施的混乱。在课程的利益相关者中,对未来的胃肠病学家进行解剖学的需求评估将有助于解决这个问题。本研究旨在就其所修读的胃肠病学医学博士课程的教学及评估中涉及到的解剖学以外的课题进行反馈。材料与方法:横断面研究于2002年7月至2003年12月在达卡Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib医科大学(BSMMU)解剖学系进行。问卷调查(基于对一本胃肠病学教材的分析)以封闭式问题的形式发放给9名医学博士胃肠病学课程的教师/从业人员、学生(住院医师)和论文部分的学生。结果:大多数参与者认为涵盖“所需”的主题数量为11个中的2个。对于大多数主题,教学或评估被认为“超出要求”。虽然超过70%的受访者认为课程是定制的,75%的人倾向于同意教学和评估在临床工作中有用,55.6%的人认为它迎合了更多的回忆层面的知识,85%的人认为课程中没有采取“基于问题的方法”。结论:考虑到本研究的结果,可以采取积极的措施重组课程的解剖部分,使其临床胃肠病学家。DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bja.v11i2.20672孟加拉解剖学杂志,2013年7月,Vol. 11 No. 2 pp 62-67
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信