Vibration Assessment of Thermowells

P. Prasad, S. Poddar, Finlay Casey
{"title":"Vibration Assessment of Thermowells","authors":"P. Prasad, S. Poddar, Finlay Casey","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n ASME PTC 19.3 2016 code does not provide clear guideline on how to deal with the vibration problems of existing thermowells that are currently in operation and may be operating near inline or transverse vibration zone.\n While the code allows passing through the in-line vibration zone, it prohibits operation completely in transverse vibration due to lock-in phenomenon. Once lock-in occurs, the thermowell gets into resonance and in the absence of adequate damping in the system, the thermowell vibration amplitude would keep on building with every cycle till eventual failure. It was identified that several operating assets had thermowells operating in the prohibited zone as per ASME PTC 19.3 and were facing a greater process safety risk.\n Damping though difficult to predict, plays very crucial role in amplitude when thermowell is operated in critical zone i.e. within 20% of natural frequency. Hence it is very important to estimate the damping factor. ASME PTC 19.3 2016 have suggested conservative damping factor (ζ) of 0.0005 based on the lab studies. The test set-up assumes the piping system as rigid component, whereas, in the field piping systems are flexible. Using a conservative damping in the stress calculations leads to a high fictitious stress indicating failure of the thermowell.\n In the present paper, a method is suggested to quantify the damping in the system by utilizing actual site vibration measurement of thermowell in the finite element analysis and thus a more realistic assessment of the stresses in the thermowell can be made. This assessment presented a much larger damping present in the system than ASME suggested and led asset to continue operate the plant with no risk of unplanned downtime as well as technical integrity of equipment. The results are presented for one sample thermowells.","PeriodicalId":339189,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: Operations, Applications, and Components","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: Operations, Applications, and Components","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ASME PTC 19.3 2016 code does not provide clear guideline on how to deal with the vibration problems of existing thermowells that are currently in operation and may be operating near inline or transverse vibration zone. While the code allows passing through the in-line vibration zone, it prohibits operation completely in transverse vibration due to lock-in phenomenon. Once lock-in occurs, the thermowell gets into resonance and in the absence of adequate damping in the system, the thermowell vibration amplitude would keep on building with every cycle till eventual failure. It was identified that several operating assets had thermowells operating in the prohibited zone as per ASME PTC 19.3 and were facing a greater process safety risk. Damping though difficult to predict, plays very crucial role in amplitude when thermowell is operated in critical zone i.e. within 20% of natural frequency. Hence it is very important to estimate the damping factor. ASME PTC 19.3 2016 have suggested conservative damping factor (ζ) of 0.0005 based on the lab studies. The test set-up assumes the piping system as rigid component, whereas, in the field piping systems are flexible. Using a conservative damping in the stress calculations leads to a high fictitious stress indicating failure of the thermowell. In the present paper, a method is suggested to quantify the damping in the system by utilizing actual site vibration measurement of thermowell in the finite element analysis and thus a more realistic assessment of the stresses in the thermowell can be made. This assessment presented a much larger damping present in the system than ASME suggested and led asset to continue operate the plant with no risk of unplanned downtime as well as technical integrity of equipment. The results are presented for one sample thermowells.
热套管振动评估
ASME PTC 19.3 2016规范没有提供关于如何处理当前运行中的现有热电偶套管的振动问题的明确指导,这些热电偶套管可能在内线或横向振动区附近运行。虽然代码允许通过在线振动区,但由于锁定现象,它完全禁止在横向振动中操作。一旦锁定发生,热电偶就会进入谐振状态,并且在系统中没有足够的阻尼的情况下,热电偶的振动幅度会随着每个周期的增加而不断增加,直到最终失效。根据ASME PTC 19.3的规定,确定了几个运行资产的热电偶套管在禁区内运行,并且面临更大的过程安全风险。阻尼虽然难以预测,但当热电偶在临界区域(即固有频率的20%以内)工作时,对振幅起着至关重要的作用。因此,对阻尼系数的估计是非常重要的。ASME PTC 19.3 2016根据实验室研究建议保守阻尼系数(ζ)为0.0005。试验设置假定管道系统为刚性部件,然而,在现场管道系统是柔性的。在应力计算中使用保守阻尼会导致较高的虚拟应力,表明热电偶套管失效。本文提出了一种在有限元分析中利用热电偶井的实际现场振动测量来量化系统阻尼的方法,从而可以对热电偶井中的应力进行更真实的评估。该评估显示,系统中的阻尼比ASME建议的要大得多,并导致资产继续运行工厂,没有计划外停机的风险,以及设备的技术完整性。给出了一个样品温度计套管的测试结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信