„Worin noch niemand war“ – Heimat als Erinnerung und Konstrukt

E. Angehrn
{"title":"„Worin noch niemand war“ – Heimat als Erinnerung und Konstrukt","authors":"E. Angehrn","doi":"10.23963/cnp.2021.6.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Home is an ambiguous idea, in terms of spatial and temporal location as well as in terms of reality and valuation. Home(land) can be near or far, encompass small or large spaces, be anchored in an urban area or in the open landscape. It can belong to the oldest past, be irretrievably lost, destroyed, or lie in an unknown future as a utopian place of longing. Homeland can be the real place of origin or where we live at the moment -- or the construct of a place where no one has ever been. The deepest ambivalence that emerges in critical debates about old and new literatures on homelands concerns the oscillation between the anthropological necessity, the human need for home -- and its contingency and the will to relinquish it in favor of a free, unbound way of life.","PeriodicalId":375431,"journal":{"name":"Colloquium: New Philologies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colloquium: New Philologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23963/cnp.2021.6.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Home is an ambiguous idea, in terms of spatial and temporal location as well as in terms of reality and valuation. Home(land) can be near or far, encompass small or large spaces, be anchored in an urban area or in the open landscape. It can belong to the oldest past, be irretrievably lost, destroyed, or lie in an unknown future as a utopian place of longing. Homeland can be the real place of origin or where we live at the moment -- or the construct of a place where no one has ever been. The deepest ambivalence that emerges in critical debates about old and new literatures on homelands concerns the oscillation between the anthropological necessity, the human need for home -- and its contingency and the will to relinquish it in favor of a free, unbound way of life.
家是一个模糊的概念,无论是在空间和时间位置上,还是在现实和价值上。家(土地)可以近或远,包含或小或大的空间,锚定在一个城市地区或开放的景观。它可以属于最古老的过去,也可以无可挽回地丢失、毁灭,或者作为一个向往的乌托邦,躺在一个未知的未来。祖国可以是真正的原籍地,也可以是我们现在生活的地方,也可以是一个没有人去过的地方。在关于故土的新旧文献的批判性辩论中,出现的最深刻的矛盾心理涉及人类学必要性、人类对故土的需求——以及它的偶然性和放弃它以支持自由、不受约束的生活方式的意愿之间的摇摆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信