The role of technical in the preservation and reproduction of the living principle in a human

Dmitry V. Solomko
{"title":"The role of technical in the preservation and reproduction of the living principle in a human","authors":"Dmitry V. Solomko","doi":"10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-164-168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The tendency to strengthen the priority of the technical side of life and the activity of a modern person, characterized by increasing complexity and ambiguity in the definition of a human and his world, aggravates the problem of preserving and reproduction of a living principle in a human. A problematic question arises: is a person – a living person – possible in a technical and technologized world in general? Theoretical analysis. The article notes that when solving the indicated problem, the rejection of the technique, the process of technicalization, technical in general are not provided. However, the absolutization of the meaning of the technical in the life and activity of a human is not supposed, when the existence of a person is reduced to the technical. A modern person needs a kind of reorientation – not to be included in the world of technology and techniques, but, on the contrary, to include them in his life in order to remain modernly alive. All the diversity of life at the expense of new techniques is ensured. Conclusion. In relations between the human and the technical, it is proposed to be based on the principles of the eco-humanistic approach (integrity, coordination, consistency and optimality), when favorable development opportunities, the realization of the internal potential of each side are provided.","PeriodicalId":252065,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2023-23-2-164-168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The tendency to strengthen the priority of the technical side of life and the activity of a modern person, characterized by increasing complexity and ambiguity in the definition of a human and his world, aggravates the problem of preserving and reproduction of a living principle in a human. A problematic question arises: is a person – a living person – possible in a technical and technologized world in general? Theoretical analysis. The article notes that when solving the indicated problem, the rejection of the technique, the process of technicalization, technical in general are not provided. However, the absolutization of the meaning of the technical in the life and activity of a human is not supposed, when the existence of a person is reduced to the technical. A modern person needs a kind of reorientation – not to be included in the world of technology and techniques, but, on the contrary, to include them in his life in order to remain modernly alive. All the diversity of life at the expense of new techniques is ensured. Conclusion. In relations between the human and the technical, it is proposed to be based on the principles of the eco-humanistic approach (integrity, coordination, consistency and optimality), when favorable development opportunities, the realization of the internal potential of each side are provided.
技术在人类生命原则的保存和繁殖中的作用
介绍。加强生活的技术方面和现代人活动的优先地位的趋势,其特点是人及其世界的定义日益复杂和模糊,这加剧了在人体内保存和繁殖活的原则的问题。一个有问题的问题出现了:一个人——一个活生生的人——在一个技术和技术化的世界里是否可能存在?理论分析。文章指出,在解决所指出的问题时,没有提供技术的拒绝,技术化的过程,一般的技术。然而,当人的存在被简化为技术时,技术在人的生活和活动中的意义的绝对化是不应该的。一个现代人需要一种重新定位——不是被包括在技术和技巧的世界里,而是相反,为了保持现代的活力,把它们包括在自己的生活中。以牺牲新技术为代价来保证生命的多样性。结论。在人与技术的关系上,建议以生态人文主义的原则(整体性、协调性、一致性和最优性)为基础,在提供有利的发展机会时,实现每一方的内在潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信