Gendering Demilitarisation and Justice in Northern Ireland

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Fidelma Ashe
{"title":"Gendering Demilitarisation and Justice in Northern Ireland","authors":"Fidelma Ashe","doi":"10.1111/1467-856X.12066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article:\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Exposes how masculinised accounts of conflict transformational processes in Northern Ireland have distorted the historical record of the region's on-going transition from violent conflict.</li>\n \n <li>Assesses the theoretical and practical effects of de-gendering the analysis of conflict transformational processes in the region.</li>\n \n <li>Provides an empirical study of women's hidden contribution to the reduction of levels of paramilitary violence in ethnically divided, working-class communities in the region.</li>\n \n <li>Utilises focus group data to develop a gender-sensitive reading of community justice, security and peace.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>The 1998 Peace Agreement in Northern Ireland provoked local-level processes of demilitarisation that focused on developing community-based restorative justice practices to replace paramilitary forms of justice. These schemes were viewed as important aspects of the broader process of conflict transformation in the region. The dominant narrative surrounding the development of these new justice forms framed them as an outcome of the efforts of ex-combatant men. This article contests this narrative and examines women's contribution to the development of CBRJ in Northern Ireland. Using data from focus groups, the article exposes the consequences of displacing women in conflict transformational analysis. Additionally, it explores how women's articulation of their conflict transformational practices engenders a critical reframing of key terms in conflict transformational narratives including peace, security, and justice. This exploration reinforces wider feminist claims that any analysis of conflict transformational processes that displaces gender is both conceptually and politically problematic.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"17 4","pages":"665-680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12066","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This article:

  • Exposes how masculinised accounts of conflict transformational processes in Northern Ireland have distorted the historical record of the region's on-going transition from violent conflict.
  • Assesses the theoretical and practical effects of de-gendering the analysis of conflict transformational processes in the region.
  • Provides an empirical study of women's hidden contribution to the reduction of levels of paramilitary violence in ethnically divided, working-class communities in the region.
  • Utilises focus group data to develop a gender-sensitive reading of community justice, security and peace.

The 1998 Peace Agreement in Northern Ireland provoked local-level processes of demilitarisation that focused on developing community-based restorative justice practices to replace paramilitary forms of justice. These schemes were viewed as important aspects of the broader process of conflict transformation in the region. The dominant narrative surrounding the development of these new justice forms framed them as an outcome of the efforts of ex-combatant men. This article contests this narrative and examines women's contribution to the development of CBRJ in Northern Ireland. Using data from focus groups, the article exposes the consequences of displacing women in conflict transformational analysis. Additionally, it explores how women's articulation of their conflict transformational practices engenders a critical reframing of key terms in conflict transformational narratives including peace, security, and justice. This exploration reinforces wider feminist claims that any analysis of conflict transformational processes that displaces gender is both conceptually and politically problematic.

北爱尔兰的性别、非军事化和司法
本文:揭露北爱尔兰冲突转型过程的男性化描述如何扭曲了该地区正在进行的从暴力冲突过渡的历史记录。评估去性别化对该地区冲突转型过程分析的理论和实践影响。提供了一项关于妇女对减少该地区种族分裂的工人阶级社区准军事暴力水平的隐性贡献的实证研究。利用焦点小组数据,对社区正义、安全与和平进行性别敏感的解读。1998年《北爱尔兰和平协定》引发了地方一级的非军事化进程,重点是发展以社区为基础的恢复性司法做法,以取代准军事形式的司法。这些计划被视为该区域更广泛的冲突转变进程的重要方面。围绕这些新司法形式发展的主流叙事将其框定为前战斗人员努力的结果。本文对这种说法提出了质疑,并考察了妇女对北爱尔兰CBRJ发展的贡献。本文利用焦点小组的数据,揭示了在冲突转型分析中取代妇女的后果。此外,它还探讨了妇女如何阐明其冲突转型实践,从而对包括和平、安全和正义在内的冲突转型叙事中的关键术语进行关键重构。这一探索强化了更广泛的女权主义主张,即任何对取代性别的冲突转化过程的分析都是在概念上和政治上都有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信