{"title":"Structural transformation, the mismeasurement of productivity growth and the cost disease of services","authors":"Alwyn Young","doi":"10.1257/AER.104.11.3635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If workers self-select into sectors based upon their relative productivity in different tasks, and comparative advantage is aligned with absolute advantage, then as a sector's employment share increases (decreases) the average efficacy of its workforce will fall (rise). This provides a potential explanation for the differential in the measured productivity growth of contracting goods and expanding services. Using changes in defense expenditures as an exogenous shifter of employment shares, I estimate that the elasticity of worker efficacy with respect to employment shares is substantially negative. While conventional estimates indicate that productivity growth in goods is .8% and 1.4% faster than in services in the US and the OECD, respectively, regression point estimates suggest that the true difference might lie between a .5 percent advantage for goods and a .4 percent advantage for services. Taking the middle of this range, the view that goods and services have similar productivity growth rates provides a plausible alternative characterization of growth in developed economies.","PeriodicalId":359449,"journal":{"name":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Research Online Documents on Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.104.11.3635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77
Abstract
If workers self-select into sectors based upon their relative productivity in different tasks, and comparative advantage is aligned with absolute advantage, then as a sector's employment share increases (decreases) the average efficacy of its workforce will fall (rise). This provides a potential explanation for the differential in the measured productivity growth of contracting goods and expanding services. Using changes in defense expenditures as an exogenous shifter of employment shares, I estimate that the elasticity of worker efficacy with respect to employment shares is substantially negative. While conventional estimates indicate that productivity growth in goods is .8% and 1.4% faster than in services in the US and the OECD, respectively, regression point estimates suggest that the true difference might lie between a .5 percent advantage for goods and a .4 percent advantage for services. Taking the middle of this range, the view that goods and services have similar productivity growth rates provides a plausible alternative characterization of growth in developed economies.