Correlation between Cerebroplacental ratio and umbilical artery Doppler with pregnancy outcome in postdates

Iman B. Abd Rabou, Hanan Abd-Elmonem Mohammed, H. Mohamed
{"title":"Correlation between Cerebroplacental ratio and umbilical artery Doppler with pregnancy outcome in postdates","authors":"Iman B. Abd Rabou, Hanan Abd-Elmonem Mohammed, H. Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/EBWHJ.2020.22320.1071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postdate pregnancy is a real problem in modern obstetrics. Its incidence has been reported to be between 4-14% with an average of 10.5%. Postdate pregnancy is associated with increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Assessment of fetal wellbeing is a corner stone in the management of prolonged pregnancy.Aim: To assess the usefulness of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) compared with umbilical artery Doppler alone in prediction of the intrapartum fetal hypoxia and the adverse perinatal outcome in uncomplicated pregnancies (low risk pregnancy) beyond 40 weeks.  Patients and Methods: This study was carried out on 60 pregnant women with uncomplicated postdate pregnancies beyond 40 weeks gestation attending the antenatal clinics of Al-Zahraa University Hospital for antepartum assessment of CPR.  Results:CPR had a high predictive value in postdate pregnancy with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV (85.7%, 73.9%, 50%, and 94.4%), respectively, in comparison to other parameters, with cut off value (0.94).Conclusion:CPR had the highest sensitivity and NPV in prediction of neonatal outcome. Cerebroplacental ratio less than 0.94 were the best predictor of adverse perinatal outcome and neonatal ICU admission.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/EBWHJ.2020.22320.1071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Postdate pregnancy is a real problem in modern obstetrics. Its incidence has been reported to be between 4-14% with an average of 10.5%. Postdate pregnancy is associated with increased risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Assessment of fetal wellbeing is a corner stone in the management of prolonged pregnancy.Aim: To assess the usefulness of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) compared with umbilical artery Doppler alone in prediction of the intrapartum fetal hypoxia and the adverse perinatal outcome in uncomplicated pregnancies (low risk pregnancy) beyond 40 weeks.  Patients and Methods: This study was carried out on 60 pregnant women with uncomplicated postdate pregnancies beyond 40 weeks gestation attending the antenatal clinics of Al-Zahraa University Hospital for antepartum assessment of CPR.  Results:CPR had a high predictive value in postdate pregnancy with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV (85.7%, 73.9%, 50%, and 94.4%), respectively, in comparison to other parameters, with cut off value (0.94).Conclusion:CPR had the highest sensitivity and NPV in prediction of neonatal outcome. Cerebroplacental ratio less than 0.94 were the best predictor of adverse perinatal outcome and neonatal ICU admission.
产后脑胎盘比和脐动脉多普勒与妊娠结局的关系
背景:迟孕是现代产科的一个现实问题。据报道,其发病率在4-14%之间,平均为10.5%。逾期妊娠与围产期发病率和死亡率增加有关。胎儿健康评估是延长妊娠管理的基石。目的:评价脑胎盘比(CPR)与单独脐动脉多普勒在预测40周以上无并发症妊娠(低危妊娠)产时胎儿缺氧及不良围产期结局中的应用价值。患者和方法:本研究对60名在Al-Zahraa大学医院产前门诊进行心肺复苏产前评估的妊娠40周以上无并发症的妊娠妇女进行了研究。结果:与其他参数相比,CPR对晚期妊娠的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV具有较高的预测价值(分别为85.7%、73.9%、50%和94.4%),截断值为0.94。结论:心肺复苏术在预测新生儿预后方面具有最高的敏感性和NPV。脑胎盘比小于0.94是不良围产期结局和新生儿入住ICU的最佳预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信