Better targeting of farmers as a channel for poverty reduction: a systematic review of Farmer Field Schools targeting

Daniel Phillips, H. Waddington, H. White
{"title":"Better targeting of farmers as a channel for poverty reduction: a systematic review of Farmer Field Schools targeting","authors":"Daniel Phillips, H. Waddington, H. White","doi":"10.1080/21665095.2014.924841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farmer Field Schools (FFSs) are an adult education and agricultural extension approach designed to empower farmers, increase productivity and improve livelihoods. We systematically review the literature and undertake content analysis, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to explore how FFSs are targeted and how the targeting affects participation and performance. Some FFS programs are found to include ‘equity’ criteria targeting the poorest or those judged to be most in need of the benefits FFSs offer. However, many FFS programs include ‘effectiveness’ targeting criteria designed to promote inclusion of farmers with more resources, education and social agency, with the aim of maximizing the impact of the program. While programs typically achieved the effectiveness-related inclusion objectives, some failed to fulfil the equity-related inclusion goals. This was because either conflicting targeting criteria and participant-selection mechanisms favored elite capture, or the need for a minimum level of social and economic capital precluded participation for some. There is also evidence that the FFS program participants' characteristics can significantly impact outcomes. Programs with relatively more educated participants may be more effective in improving the adoption of farming practices, increasing yields and passing on FFS learning to neighboring farmers living in the same communities. However, poorer farmers benefit more when they participate directly in programs than when they receive knowledge indirectly.","PeriodicalId":273252,"journal":{"name":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.924841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Farmer Field Schools (FFSs) are an adult education and agricultural extension approach designed to empower farmers, increase productivity and improve livelihoods. We systematically review the literature and undertake content analysis, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis to explore how FFSs are targeted and how the targeting affects participation and performance. Some FFS programs are found to include ‘equity’ criteria targeting the poorest or those judged to be most in need of the benefits FFSs offer. However, many FFS programs include ‘effectiveness’ targeting criteria designed to promote inclusion of farmers with more resources, education and social agency, with the aim of maximizing the impact of the program. While programs typically achieved the effectiveness-related inclusion objectives, some failed to fulfil the equity-related inclusion goals. This was because either conflicting targeting criteria and participant-selection mechanisms favored elite capture, or the need for a minimum level of social and economic capital precluded participation for some. There is also evidence that the FFS program participants' characteristics can significantly impact outcomes. Programs with relatively more educated participants may be more effective in improving the adoption of farming practices, increasing yields and passing on FFS learning to neighboring farmers living in the same communities. However, poorer farmers benefit more when they participate directly in programs than when they receive knowledge indirectly.
更好地将农民作为减贫渠道:对农民田间学校目标的系统审查
农民田间学校是一种成人教育和农业推广方法,旨在增强农民的权能,提高生产力和改善生计。我们系统地回顾了文献,并进行了内容分析、元分析和元回归分析,以探讨家庭教师如何有针对性,以及针对性如何影响参与和绩效。研究发现,一些农民田间学校项目包括针对最贫困人口或被认为最需要农民田间学校提供的福利的人的“公平”标准。然而,许多农民田间学校项目包括“有效性”目标标准,旨在通过更多的资源、教育和社会机构促进农民融入,以最大限度地发挥项目的影响。虽然项目通常实现了与有效性相关的包容目标,但有些项目未能实现与公平相关的包容目标。这是因为相互冲突的目标标准和参与者选择机制有利于捕获精英,或者对最低水平的社会和经济资本的需求阻止了一些人的参与。还有证据表明,农民田间学校项目参与者的特征可以显著影响结果。参与者受教育程度相对较高的项目可能更有效地促进农业实践的采用,提高产量,并将田间FFS的学习知识传授给生活在同一社区的邻近农民。然而,较贫穷的农民直接参与项目比间接获得知识受益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信