Algorithmic Impact Assessment as a Control System of Automated Disposition

Eunjeong Kwon
{"title":"Algorithmic Impact Assessment as a Control System of Automated Disposition","authors":"Eunjeong Kwon","doi":"10.46751/nplak.2023.19.2.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Framework Act on Administration, scheduled to take effect in March 2021, provides an explicit basis for fully automated administrative decisions by introducing the concept of ‘automatic disposition’ in Article 20. Traditionally, the ‘automation of administration’ was significant as an auxiliary administrative procedure consisting of automatic mechanical devices such as traffic signal transmission, tax, and utility bill calculation. Moreover, since automated administrative decisions using artificial intelligence (AI) technology are also included in this automatic disposition, there is room for legal acceptance of automated administrative decisions based on artificial intelligence algorithms that exceed the level of conventional computerization or partial automation. However, it is still a long way from implementing a fully automated administrative decision system based on current law and having technical and institutional safety devices for it. On the other hand, the Framework Act on Intelligent Informatization, which took effect in December 2020, introduced a new ‘social impact assessment’ for intelligent information services that have far-reach effects on citizens’ lives. According to Article 56 of the Act, the main goal of this impact assessment system is to investigate and evaluate the impact of intelligent information services on society, economy, culture, etc., disclose the results, reflect them in policies, and directly recommend appropriate measures. Since the scope of intelligent information services subject to evaluation is not limited to the private sector, it should be considered that intelligent information services in the administrative sector can also be subject to social impact assessment in this article. It is reasonable to assume that automatic administrative services by artificial intelligence system belong to a wide range of intelligent information services prescribed by law, and that automatic disposition issued as a fully automated system based on intelligent information technology can also be subject to social impact assessment. Although no provisions have been found in law to assess the impact of automated administrative decisions, the government of Canada has implemented the “Directive on Automated Decision-Making” since April 2019, which systematically regulates the automated administrative decision-making system. The requirement that constitutes an important axis of this directive is the ‘algorithmic impact assessment'. For an automated administrative decision-making system that bears relatively stricter legality and public responsibility than private companies' services, it is necessary to process and operate an impact assessment that reviews safety, transparency, and solidity in advance. In this paper, referring to the Canadian case, as a control system of the algorithm-based administrative decision-making system, I propose the institutionalization of the “algorithmic impact assessment” in consideration of the connection with the social impact assessment under the current law.","PeriodicalId":423802,"journal":{"name":"National Public Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Public Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46751/nplak.2023.19.2.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Framework Act on Administration, scheduled to take effect in March 2021, provides an explicit basis for fully automated administrative decisions by introducing the concept of ‘automatic disposition’ in Article 20. Traditionally, the ‘automation of administration’ was significant as an auxiliary administrative procedure consisting of automatic mechanical devices such as traffic signal transmission, tax, and utility bill calculation. Moreover, since automated administrative decisions using artificial intelligence (AI) technology are also included in this automatic disposition, there is room for legal acceptance of automated administrative decisions based on artificial intelligence algorithms that exceed the level of conventional computerization or partial automation. However, it is still a long way from implementing a fully automated administrative decision system based on current law and having technical and institutional safety devices for it. On the other hand, the Framework Act on Intelligent Informatization, which took effect in December 2020, introduced a new ‘social impact assessment’ for intelligent information services that have far-reach effects on citizens’ lives. According to Article 56 of the Act, the main goal of this impact assessment system is to investigate and evaluate the impact of intelligent information services on society, economy, culture, etc., disclose the results, reflect them in policies, and directly recommend appropriate measures. Since the scope of intelligent information services subject to evaluation is not limited to the private sector, it should be considered that intelligent information services in the administrative sector can also be subject to social impact assessment in this article. It is reasonable to assume that automatic administrative services by artificial intelligence system belong to a wide range of intelligent information services prescribed by law, and that automatic disposition issued as a fully automated system based on intelligent information technology can also be subject to social impact assessment. Although no provisions have been found in law to assess the impact of automated administrative decisions, the government of Canada has implemented the “Directive on Automated Decision-Making” since April 2019, which systematically regulates the automated administrative decision-making system. The requirement that constitutes an important axis of this directive is the ‘algorithmic impact assessment'. For an automated administrative decision-making system that bears relatively stricter legality and public responsibility than private companies' services, it is necessary to process and operate an impact assessment that reviews safety, transparency, and solidity in advance. In this paper, referring to the Canadian case, as a control system of the algorithm-based administrative decision-making system, I propose the institutionalization of the “algorithmic impact assessment” in consideration of the connection with the social impact assessment under the current law.
作为自动处置控制系统的算法影响评估
计划于2021年3月生效的《行政框架法》,通过在第20条中引入“自动处置”的概念,为全自动行政决策提供了明确的基础。传统上,“行政自动化”是重要的辅助行政程序,由自动机械装置组成,如交通信号传输、税收和水电费计算。此外,由于使用人工智能(AI)技术的自动行政决策也包括在这种自动处置中,因此基于人工智能算法的自动行政决策在法律上有接受的余地,这些算法超过了传统计算机化或部分自动化的水平。但是,要实现以现行法律为基础的完全自动化的行政决策系统,并具备相应的技术保障和制度保障,还有很长的路要走。另一方面,2020年12月生效的《智能信息化框架法》对对国民生活产生深远影响的智能信息服务引入了新的“社会影响评估”。根据本法第56条规定,该影响评价制度的主要目的是调查、评价智能信息服务对社会、经济、文化等产生的影响,并公开结果,反映到政策中,直接建议相应的措施。由于受评估的智能信息服务范围不限于私营部门,因此应考虑行政部门的智能信息服务也可以在本文中进行社会影响评估。可以合理地假设,人工智能系统的自动行政服务属于法律规定的广泛的智能信息服务,自动处置作为基于智能信息技术的全自动化系统发布也可以进行社会影响评估。尽管法律中没有规定评估自动化行政决策的影响,但加拿大政府自2019年4月起实施了“自动化决策指令”,对自动化行政决策系统进行了系统规范。构成该指令重要轴心的要求是“算法影响评估”。与民间企业的服务相比,在合法性和公共责任方面相对严格的自动化行政决策系统,有必要提前进行安全性、透明性、稳定期等评价,并进行运营。本文参考加拿大案例,考虑到“算法影响评估”与现行法律下的社会影响评估的联系,提出“算法影响评估”作为基于算法的行政决策系统的一种控制制度的制度化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信