Bridging Organizational Resilience and Management Control Systems - A Systematic Review

M. Weber, P. Roetzel
{"title":"Bridging Organizational Resilience and Management Control Systems - A Systematic Review","authors":"M. Weber, P. Roetzel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3785416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations have repeatedly faced challenges due to disasters such as pandemics, economic or financial crises, and other unexpected events. One reason why some organizations cope more efficiently than others with such unforeseen circumstances might be found in their resilience design. However, while this has long been the subject of research, there is still no consensus in the literature, and there is no common understanding regarding the definition of the term ‘resilience’, the conceptualizations at the organizational level, and its interaction with management control systems (MCS). This study bridges the MCS and organizational resilience literature and provides a broader understanding of the relationship between the organization and adverse events. To identify relationships between MCS and organizational resilience, we perform a systematic review of organizational resilience conceptualizations and definitions, supplemented by current empirical findings using a content analysis and a citation network analysis. We investigate different approaches to achieve organizational resilience objectives by using MCS (especially Simons’ levers of control framework) to show relationships, trade-offs, complementarities, and substitutes, and provide initial approaches for applying complementarity theory to explain the relationship between MCS design and use, and organizational resilience. We reveal gaps between organizational resilience and MCS literature, and provide avenues for future research, in particular a preliminary roadmap for empirical research. Our findings suggest that integrating organizational resilience measures into MCS might be beneficial for organizations to manage resilience at the organizational level and achieve complementary effects. In addition, organizations could increase their resilience capacity by building resilience-oriented management controls (ROMC).","PeriodicalId":357263,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Accounting eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3785416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizations have repeatedly faced challenges due to disasters such as pandemics, economic or financial crises, and other unexpected events. One reason why some organizations cope more efficiently than others with such unforeseen circumstances might be found in their resilience design. However, while this has long been the subject of research, there is still no consensus in the literature, and there is no common understanding regarding the definition of the term ‘resilience’, the conceptualizations at the organizational level, and its interaction with management control systems (MCS). This study bridges the MCS and organizational resilience literature and provides a broader understanding of the relationship between the organization and adverse events. To identify relationships between MCS and organizational resilience, we perform a systematic review of organizational resilience conceptualizations and definitions, supplemented by current empirical findings using a content analysis and a citation network analysis. We investigate different approaches to achieve organizational resilience objectives by using MCS (especially Simons’ levers of control framework) to show relationships, trade-offs, complementarities, and substitutes, and provide initial approaches for applying complementarity theory to explain the relationship between MCS design and use, and organizational resilience. We reveal gaps between organizational resilience and MCS literature, and provide avenues for future research, in particular a preliminary roadmap for empirical research. Our findings suggest that integrating organizational resilience measures into MCS might be beneficial for organizations to manage resilience at the organizational level and achieve complementary effects. In addition, organizations could increase their resilience capacity by building resilience-oriented management controls (ROMC).
连接组织弹性和管理控制系统-系统回顾
组织一再面临由于灾难(如流行病、经济或金融危机以及其他意外事件)而带来的挑战。一些组织比其他组织更有效地应对这种不可预见的情况的一个原因可能在于它们的弹性设计。然而,虽然这一直是研究的主题,但在文献中仍然没有达成共识,并且对于术语“弹性”的定义,组织层面的概念化以及它与管理控制系统(MCS)的相互作用没有共同的理解。本研究将MCS和组织弹性文献联系起来,为组织与不良事件之间的关系提供了更广泛的理解。为了确定MCS与组织弹性之间的关系,我们对组织弹性的概念和定义进行了系统的回顾,并辅以目前使用内容分析和引用网络分析的实证研究结果。我们通过使用MCS(特别是Simons的控制杠杆框架)来展示关系、权衡、互补性和替代,研究了实现组织弹性目标的不同方法,并为应用互补性理论来解释MCS设计和使用与组织弹性之间的关系提供了初步方法。我们揭示了组织弹性与MCS文献之间的差距,并为未来的研究提供了途径,特别是初步的实证研究路线图。研究结果表明,将组织弹性措施整合到MCS中,可能有利于组织在组织层面对弹性进行管理,并实现互补效应。此外,组织可以通过构建面向弹性的管理控制(ROMC)来提高其弹性能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信