Be Careful what you Wish for

R. Chapman
{"title":"Be Careful what you Wish for","authors":"R. Chapman","doi":"10.1145/3347709.3347796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Fall of 2019, Carleton's new integrated science facility is scheduled to open for business. The ITS department was determined to be more involved in conversations around the design and implementation of technology in this building than it had been on previous projects, and from as early in the project as possible. The administration saw the value in this, and brought them in. However, the commitment turned out to be far more than was bargained for. An expectation of slightly greater consultation and attendance at a handful of more meetings grew into a significant time commitment and responsibility for the success of project, work that spanned almost three years and hundreds of staff hours for three members of the ITS team. The department's involvement began in 2016, reviewing networking, lab layouts, classroom tech, and printer locations. Soon, ITS staff were leading plan reviews for science faculty and staff on these and additional aspects of the building. This led to involvement in regular reviews of architectural plans, power locations, data ports, furniture design, lighting, and more. There were weekly walkthroughs of the construction site, checking progress, and working directly with the trades on site to identify and address issues as it became apparent that certain design choices did not necessarily work in practical reality. The project added considerable workload to the staff involved, even before they started the hands-on work of bringing the building online after construction was substantially completed. Was this greater involvement worth the time and effort? Will the building be in substantially better shape than it would have been without as much ITS involvement? This paper will discuss this new approach, walking through ITS’ involvement in the project, highlighting both the aspects that the department chose and expected to be a part of, as well as those that they were drawn into as a result of their initial engagement.","PeriodicalId":130111,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGUCCS Annual Conference","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGUCCS Annual Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3347709.3347796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Fall of 2019, Carleton's new integrated science facility is scheduled to open for business. The ITS department was determined to be more involved in conversations around the design and implementation of technology in this building than it had been on previous projects, and from as early in the project as possible. The administration saw the value in this, and brought them in. However, the commitment turned out to be far more than was bargained for. An expectation of slightly greater consultation and attendance at a handful of more meetings grew into a significant time commitment and responsibility for the success of project, work that spanned almost three years and hundreds of staff hours for three members of the ITS team. The department's involvement began in 2016, reviewing networking, lab layouts, classroom tech, and printer locations. Soon, ITS staff were leading plan reviews for science faculty and staff on these and additional aspects of the building. This led to involvement in regular reviews of architectural plans, power locations, data ports, furniture design, lighting, and more. There were weekly walkthroughs of the construction site, checking progress, and working directly with the trades on site to identify and address issues as it became apparent that certain design choices did not necessarily work in practical reality. The project added considerable workload to the staff involved, even before they started the hands-on work of bringing the building online after construction was substantially completed. Was this greater involvement worth the time and effort? Will the building be in substantially better shape than it would have been without as much ITS involvement? This paper will discuss this new approach, walking through ITS’ involvement in the project, highlighting both the aspects that the department chose and expected to be a part of, as well as those that they were drawn into as a result of their initial engagement.
小心你的愿望
2019年秋季,卡尔顿的新综合科学设施计划投入运营。与之前的项目相比,ITS部门决定更多地参与到围绕该建筑的设计和技术实施的对话中,并且从项目的早期开始。政府看到了其中的价值,就把他们请来了。然而,事实证明,承诺远远超出了预期。对更多的咨询和参加更多的会议的期望逐渐变成了对项目成功的重大时间承诺和责任,这项工作跨越了几乎三年的时间,ITS团队的三个成员花费了数百个工作小时。该部门从2016年开始参与,审查网络、实验室布局、教室技术和打印机位置。很快,ITS的工作人员就领导了科学教师和员工对建筑的这些和其他方面的计划审查。这导致了对建筑规划、电源位置、数据端口、家具设计、照明等的定期审查。每周都要对施工现场进行巡视,检查进度,并直接与现场的行业合作,以识别和解决问题,因为很明显,某些设计选择在实际生活中不一定有效。该项目给相关人员增加了相当大的工作量,甚至在他们开始动手工作之前,即在建筑基本完成后将建筑物上线。投入更多的时间和精力是否值得?如果没有ITS的参与,大楼的外观会不会更好?本文将讨论这种新方法,通过ITS在项目中的参与,强调部门选择和期望参与的方面,以及他们最初参与的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信