Emergency remote teaching or andragogical innovation? Higher education in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic
S. Tan, J. Rudolph, J. Crawford, K. Butler-Henderson
{"title":"Emergency remote teaching or andragogical innovation? Higher education in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"S. Tan, J. Rudolph, J. Crawford, K. Butler-Henderson","doi":"10.37074/jalt.2022.5.s1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Singapore higher education’s intraperiod response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic was unique compared to other countries, being praised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for its early response. Like many other countries, alarming growth in cases appeared, and careful strategies for the continuation of learning were implemented. This paper provides a critical case study and reflection-in-action (Green et al., 2020) of the Singaporean intraperiod response, exploring individual responses from a sample of six autonomous universities, two international universities with campuses in Singapore, and four Private Education Institutions. Through a defined qualitative content analysis of university documentation, scant academic literature, and government and media sources, an understanding of the pandemic response in Singapore was possible. We chose to ensure full coverage of the city-state to enable a comprehensive country analysis in contrast to the growing volume of single-institution pandemic and emergency remote teaching case studies applying a sociotechnical theoretical framework to guide an analysis between educational technology systems and the people using it to teach, work, and learn. This study identified that while tasks and technology were presented with depth, the social elements – people and systems – were often lacking accurate description. We discuss how this technical focus has practical and research implications, and how future research and university teaching and learning practice can better respond to future challenges through reflection of the sociotechnical perspective. © 2022, Kaplan Singapore. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":296891,"journal":{"name":"Technology and education. Innovation and hindrances","volume":"68 9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and education. Innovation and hindrances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2022.5.s1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Singapore higher education’s intraperiod response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic was unique compared to other countries, being praised by the World Health Organisation (WHO) for its early response. Like many other countries, alarming growth in cases appeared, and careful strategies for the continuation of learning were implemented. This paper provides a critical case study and reflection-in-action (Green et al., 2020) of the Singaporean intraperiod response, exploring individual responses from a sample of six autonomous universities, two international universities with campuses in Singapore, and four Private Education Institutions. Through a defined qualitative content analysis of university documentation, scant academic literature, and government and media sources, an understanding of the pandemic response in Singapore was possible. We chose to ensure full coverage of the city-state to enable a comprehensive country analysis in contrast to the growing volume of single-institution pandemic and emergency remote teaching case studies applying a sociotechnical theoretical framework to guide an analysis between educational technology systems and the people using it to teach, work, and learn. This study identified that while tasks and technology were presented with depth, the social elements – people and systems – were often lacking accurate description. We discuss how this technical focus has practical and research implications, and how future research and university teaching and learning practice can better respond to future challenges through reflection of the sociotechnical perspective. © 2022, Kaplan Singapore. All rights reserved.
应急远程教学还是教学创新?COVID-19大流行期间新加坡的高等教育
新加坡高等教育对新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行的期内反应与其他国家相比是独一无二的,因其早期反应而受到世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的赞扬。与许多其他国家一样,出现了惊人的病例增长,并实施了继续学习的审慎战略。本文提供了新加坡时期内回应的关键案例研究和行动反思(Green et al., 2020),探讨了来自六所自治大学、两所在新加坡设有校区的国际大学和四所私立教育机构样本的个人回应。通过对大学文献、少量学术文献以及政府和媒体来源进行明确的定性内容分析,有可能了解新加坡的大流行应对措施。我们选择确保城市国家的全面覆盖,以实现全面的国家分析,而不是使用社会技术理论框架来指导教育技术系统与使用它进行教学,工作和学习的人之间的分析的单一机构流行病和紧急远程教学案例研究的数量不断增加。这项研究发现,虽然任务和技术被深度呈现,但社会元素——人和系统——往往缺乏准确的描述。我们讨论了这种技术焦点如何具有实践和研究意义,以及未来的研究和大学教学实践如何通过反映社会技术观点来更好地应对未来的挑战。©2022,Kaplan新加坡。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。