Postoperative nausea and vomiting following lower limb surgery :a comparison between single-injection intraarticular anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia.

Yuta Uemura, Y. Sakai, Y. Tsutsumi, N. Kakuta, Chiaki Murakami, S. Satomi, Takuro Oyama, N. Ohshita, Tomoya Takasago, Daisuke Hamada, K. Sairyo, Katsuya Tanaka
{"title":"Postoperative nausea and vomiting following lower limb surgery :a comparison between single-injection intraarticular anesthesia and continuous epidural anesthesia.","authors":"Yuta Uemura, Y. Sakai, Y. Tsutsumi, N. Kakuta, Chiaki Murakami, S. Satomi, Takuro Oyama, N. Ohshita, Tomoya Takasago, Daisuke Hamada, K. Sairyo, Katsuya Tanaka","doi":"10.2152/jmi.66.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study Objective : the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following single-injection intraarticular anesthesia was compared to that following continuous epidural anesthesia. Design : Prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Setting : University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients : Forty-eight patients finally participated in this study, and each group contained twenty-four patients. Interventions : Patients scheduled to undergo lower limb surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups, to receive either single-injection intraarticular or continuous epidural anesthesia for postoperative analgesia. Measurements : The incidence and severity of PONV, complete response rates (i.e., no vomiting or rescue antiemetic use), and pain scores were recorded 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Main results : No significant differences between groups were observed in the incidence and severity of PONV, rescue antiemetic use, or complete response rate at any of the time points, but only the use of rescue analgesics was significantly less in continuous epidural anesthesia group during the 2-24h postoperative period (P=0.04). Conclusion : While the use of single-injection intraarticular anesthesia following lower limb surgery did not prevent PONV more than continuous epidural anesthesia in this study, the intraarticular technique still provides greater simplicity, safety, and cost-effectiveness. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 303-307, August, 2019.","PeriodicalId":183570,"journal":{"name":"The journal of medical investigation : JMI","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of medical investigation : JMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.66.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Study Objective : the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following single-injection intraarticular anesthesia was compared to that following continuous epidural anesthesia. Design : Prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Setting : University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients : Forty-eight patients finally participated in this study, and each group contained twenty-four patients. Interventions : Patients scheduled to undergo lower limb surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups, to receive either single-injection intraarticular or continuous epidural anesthesia for postoperative analgesia. Measurements : The incidence and severity of PONV, complete response rates (i.e., no vomiting or rescue antiemetic use), and pain scores were recorded 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Main results : No significant differences between groups were observed in the incidence and severity of PONV, rescue antiemetic use, or complete response rate at any of the time points, but only the use of rescue analgesics was significantly less in continuous epidural anesthesia group during the 2-24h postoperative period (P=0.04). Conclusion : While the use of single-injection intraarticular anesthesia following lower limb surgery did not prevent PONV more than continuous epidural anesthesia in this study, the intraarticular technique still provides greater simplicity, safety, and cost-effectiveness. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 303-307, August, 2019.
下肢手术后恶心呕吐:单次关节内注射麻醉与连续硬膜外麻醉的比较。
研究目的:比较单次关节内麻醉与连续硬膜外麻醉术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率。设计:前瞻性、双盲、随机研究。单位:学校附属教学医院。患者:最终48例患者参与本研究,每组24例。干预措施:将拟行下肢全麻手术的患者随机分为两组,分别接受单次关节内注射和连续硬膜外麻醉进行术后镇痛。测量:术后2、24和48小时分别记录PONV的发生率和严重程度、完全缓解率(即无呕吐或抢救止吐药使用)和疼痛评分。主要结果:各组间各时间点PONV发生率、严重程度、抢救止吐药使用情况、完全缓解率均无显著差异,仅术后2 ~ 24h持续硬膜外麻醉组抢救镇痛药使用明显减少(P=0.04)。结论:虽然在本研究中,下肢手术后使用单次关节内注射麻醉不能比连续硬膜外麻醉更有效地预防PONV,但关节内技术仍然提供了更简单、更安全、更经济的方法。[j] .中国医药科学,2016,31(2):357 - 357。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信