The relative performance and merits of CMOS technologies

A. Aitken, A. MacArthur, R. Abbott, J. Morris
{"title":"The relative performance and merits of CMOS technologies","authors":"A. Aitken, A. MacArthur, R. Abbott, J. Morris","doi":"10.1109/IEDM.1976.189049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparisons have been made between silicon gate guardbanded CMOS technology, oxide isolated CMOS and CMOS/SOS. The points of comparison include performance, density and flexibility in layout. The reduction in parasitic capacitance and the elimination of parasitic devices in the last two technologies compared with the guard-banded technology does result in significant advantages. However, only marginal performance improvement of the SOS/CMOS over the oxide isolated CMOS technology is predicted due to effects associated with the SOS material and the floating substrate.","PeriodicalId":106190,"journal":{"name":"1976 International Electron Devices Meeting","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1976 International Electron Devices Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.1976.189049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Comparisons have been made between silicon gate guardbanded CMOS technology, oxide isolated CMOS and CMOS/SOS. The points of comparison include performance, density and flexibility in layout. The reduction in parasitic capacitance and the elimination of parasitic devices in the last two technologies compared with the guard-banded technology does result in significant advantages. However, only marginal performance improvement of the SOS/CMOS over the oxide isolated CMOS technology is predicted due to effects associated with the SOS material and the floating substrate.
CMOS技术的相对性能和优点
比较了硅栅带CMOS技术、氧化物隔离CMOS技术和CMOS/SOS技术。比较点包括性能、密度和布局的灵活性。与保护带技术相比,后两种技术在减小寄生电容和消除寄生器件方面确实具有显著的优势。然而,由于与SOS材料和浮动衬底相关的影响,预计SOS/CMOS与氧化物隔离CMOS技术相比只有边际性能改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信