Factors influencing QTL mapping accuracy under complicated genetic models by computer simulation.

C. Su, Wei Wang, S. Gong, J. Zuo, S. J. Li
{"title":"Factors influencing QTL mapping accuracy under complicated genetic models by computer simulation.","authors":"C. Su, Wei Wang, S. Gong, J. Zuo, S. J. Li","doi":"10.4238/gmr15049153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The accuracy of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) identified using different sample sizes and marker densities was evaluated in different genetic models. Model I assumed one additive QTL; Model II assumed three additive QTLs plus one pair of epistatic QTLs; and Model III assumed two additive QTLs with opposite genetic effects plus two pairs of epistatic QTLs. Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) (50-1500 samples) were simulated according to the Models to study the influence of different sample sizes under different genetic models on QTL mapping accuracy. RILs with 10-100 target chromosome markers were simulated according to Models I and II to evaluate the influence of marker density on QTL mapping accuracy. Different marker densities did not significantly influence accurate estimation of genetic effects with simple additive models, but influenced QTL mapping accuracy in the additive and epistatic models. The optimum marker density was approximately 20 markers when the recombination fraction between two adjacent markers was 0.056 in the additive and epistatic models. A sample size of 150 was sufficient for detecting simple additive QTLs. Thus, a sample size of approximately 450 is needed to detect QTLs with additive and epistatic models. Sample size must be approximately 750 to detect QTLs with additive, epistatic, and combined effects between QTLs. The sample size should be increased to >750 if the genetic models of the data set become more complicated than Model III. Our results provide a theoretical basis for marker-assisted selection breeding and molecular design breeding.","PeriodicalId":189314,"journal":{"name":"Genetics and molecular research : GMR","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics and molecular research : GMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr15049153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The accuracy of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) identified using different sample sizes and marker densities was evaluated in different genetic models. Model I assumed one additive QTL; Model II assumed three additive QTLs plus one pair of epistatic QTLs; and Model III assumed two additive QTLs with opposite genetic effects plus two pairs of epistatic QTLs. Recombinant inbred lines (RILs) (50-1500 samples) were simulated according to the Models to study the influence of different sample sizes under different genetic models on QTL mapping accuracy. RILs with 10-100 target chromosome markers were simulated according to Models I and II to evaluate the influence of marker density on QTL mapping accuracy. Different marker densities did not significantly influence accurate estimation of genetic effects with simple additive models, but influenced QTL mapping accuracy in the additive and epistatic models. The optimum marker density was approximately 20 markers when the recombination fraction between two adjacent markers was 0.056 in the additive and epistatic models. A sample size of 150 was sufficient for detecting simple additive QTLs. Thus, a sample size of approximately 450 is needed to detect QTLs with additive and epistatic models. Sample size must be approximately 750 to detect QTLs with additive, epistatic, and combined effects between QTLs. The sample size should be increased to >750 if the genetic models of the data set become more complicated than Model III. Our results provide a theoretical basis for marker-assisted selection breeding and molecular design breeding.
复杂遗传模型下影响QTL定位精度的因素的计算机模拟
在不同的遗传模型中,对不同样本量和标记密度鉴定的数量性状位点(qtl)的准确性进行了评价。模型1假设有一个加性QTL;模型二假设三个可加性qtl加上一对上位性qtl;模型III假设两个遗传效应相反的可加性qtl和两对上位性qtl。根据该模型对50 ~ 1500个样本的重组自交系(RILs)进行模拟,研究不同遗传模式下不同样本量对QTL定位精度的影响。根据模型1和模型2模拟10-100个目标染色体标记的rls,评估标记密度对QTL定位精度的影响。不同标记密度对简单加性模型对遗传效应的准确估计没有显著影响,但对加性和上位性模型的QTL定位精度有显著影响。在加性和上位性模型中,当相邻两个标记之间的重组分数为0.056时,最优标记密度约为20个。150个样本量足以检测简单的加性qtl。因此,使用加性和上位性模型检测qtl需要大约450个样本量。样本量必须约为750个,以检测qtl之间具有加性、上位性和联合效应的qtl。如果数据集的遗传模型比模型III更复杂,则样本量应增加到bbb750。研究结果为标记辅助选择育种和分子设计育种提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信