Perceptions of Society's View of the Power and Status of Population Subgroups: A Quantitative Application of Schneider and Ingram's Social Construction Theory

J. Darling, R. Chard, Matthew Messel, David Rogofsky, Kristin D. Scott
{"title":"Perceptions of Society's View of the Power and Status of Population Subgroups: A Quantitative Application of Schneider and Ingram's Social Construction Theory","authors":"J. Darling, R. Chard, Matthew Messel, David Rogofsky, Kristin D. Scott","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3623502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schneider and Ingram (1993) posited that society’s view of certain groups plays a powerful role in institutionalizing the level of power and status of those groups. While the theory was well developed by Schneider and Ingram, little is known empirically about how the public’s perceptions of the power and status of certain groups align with policies and elite messaging. We examine that link using a large sample from the Understanding America Study. We use this data to create “meta-constructions”, which are measures of how individuals perceive societal views of status and power of populations grouped by gender, race, and urbanicity. We first compare our findings with Schneider and Ingram’s quadrants of idealized population categorization. We then consider how views of gender, race, and urbanicity differ across individuals with different social characteristics, finding that more powerful groups are more likely to view society as being more equal than less powerful groups.","PeriodicalId":284417,"journal":{"name":"Political Behavior: Race","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Behavior: Race","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3623502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schneider and Ingram (1993) posited that society’s view of certain groups plays a powerful role in institutionalizing the level of power and status of those groups. While the theory was well developed by Schneider and Ingram, little is known empirically about how the public’s perceptions of the power and status of certain groups align with policies and elite messaging. We examine that link using a large sample from the Understanding America Study. We use this data to create “meta-constructions”, which are measures of how individuals perceive societal views of status and power of populations grouped by gender, race, and urbanicity. We first compare our findings with Schneider and Ingram’s quadrants of idealized population categorization. We then consider how views of gender, race, and urbanicity differ across individuals with different social characteristics, finding that more powerful groups are more likely to view society as being more equal than less powerful groups.
社会对人口亚群体权力和地位的看法:施耐德和英格拉姆社会建构理论的定量应用
施耐德和英格拉姆(1993)认为,社会对某些群体的看法在使这些群体的权力水平和地位制度化方面起着强大的作用。尽管施耐德和英格拉姆很好地发展了这一理论,但很少有人从经验上了解公众对某些群体的权力和地位的看法是如何与政策和精英信息相一致的。我们使用“了解美国研究”中的一个大样本来检验这种联系。我们使用这些数据来创建“元结构”,这是衡量个人如何感知按性别、种族和城市化分组的人口的地位和权力的社会观点的措施。我们首先将我们的发现与Schneider和Ingram的理想化人口分类象限进行比较。然后,我们考虑了不同社会特征的个体对性别、种族和城市化的看法是如何不同的,发现更强大的群体比更弱的群体更有可能认为社会更平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信