Comparative study of third-party disability between mothers of children using hearing aids and those using cochlear implants

Venkat Kumar A, Aparna Nandurkar
{"title":"Comparative study of third-party disability between mothers of children using hearing aids and those using cochlear implants","authors":"Venkat Kumar A, Aparna Nandurkar","doi":"10.15406/joentr.2023.15.00527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study aims to investigate on application of ICF framework’s third-party disability in mothers of children with pre-lingual hearing impairment using hearing aids and cochlear implants. Method: This is a comparative study of 30 mothers of children (age between 8-12) using cochlear implant (G-1) and 30 mothers of children (age between 8-12) using hearing aids (G-2) was included for the study. A questionnaire was developed based on ICF-CY version, consisting of 46 questions distributed across 9 domains. The questionnaire form in the Hindi language was provided to the participants (mothers) with enough amount of time to complete it. For mothers who were not able to self-administer the tool, the researcher helped by interviewing them. Due to COVID- 19 pandemic and ensuing lockdown most parents (mothers) were unwilling to report to the clinic. Owing to this, to ensure safety of parents and children, data was obtained through virtual mode. Results: Across all domains, the comparison between Group A and Group B indicates no statistically significant difference except for two domains (general tasks and behaviours, communication). When the total third-party disability scores were analysed, it is seen that there is significant difference in third-party disability scores of the two groups. Conclusion: Findings enhances mothers of children with hearing aids report greater third-party disability as compared to mothers of children using unilateral cochlear implant. Implication: The study included only mothers and a limited number of them, hence generalizing the findings to a larger population may not be appropriate.","PeriodicalId":316775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology-ENT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/joentr.2023.15.00527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to investigate on application of ICF framework’s third-party disability in mothers of children with pre-lingual hearing impairment using hearing aids and cochlear implants. Method: This is a comparative study of 30 mothers of children (age between 8-12) using cochlear implant (G-1) and 30 mothers of children (age between 8-12) using hearing aids (G-2) was included for the study. A questionnaire was developed based on ICF-CY version, consisting of 46 questions distributed across 9 domains. The questionnaire form in the Hindi language was provided to the participants (mothers) with enough amount of time to complete it. For mothers who were not able to self-administer the tool, the researcher helped by interviewing them. Due to COVID- 19 pandemic and ensuing lockdown most parents (mothers) were unwilling to report to the clinic. Owing to this, to ensure safety of parents and children, data was obtained through virtual mode. Results: Across all domains, the comparison between Group A and Group B indicates no statistically significant difference except for two domains (general tasks and behaviours, communication). When the total third-party disability scores were analysed, it is seen that there is significant difference in third-party disability scores of the two groups. Conclusion: Findings enhances mothers of children with hearing aids report greater third-party disability as compared to mothers of children using unilateral cochlear implant. Implication: The study included only mothers and a limited number of them, hence generalizing the findings to a larger population may not be appropriate.
助听器儿童母亲与人工耳蜗儿童母亲第三方残疾的比较研究
目的:本研究旨在探讨ICF框架第三方残疾在使用助听器和人工耳蜗的语前听力障碍患儿母亲中的应用。方法:选取30名使用人工耳蜗(G-1)的儿童母亲(8-12岁)和30名使用助听器(G-2)的儿童母亲(8-12岁)进行对比研究。根据ICF-CY版本编制了一份问卷,包括分布在9个领域的46个问题。印度语的问卷表格提供给了参与者(母亲)足够的时间来完成它。对于无法自我使用该工具的母亲,研究人员通过采访她们来帮助她们。由于COVID- 19大流行和随后的封锁,大多数父母(母亲)不愿意到诊所报到。因此,为了确保家长和孩子的安全,数据是通过虚拟模式获取的。结果:在所有领域,A组和B组之间的比较没有统计学上的显著差异,除了两个领域(一般任务和行为,沟通)。当对第三方残疾总分进行分析时,可以看出两组的第三方残疾得分存在显著差异。结论:研究结果表明,与单侧人工耳蜗儿童的母亲相比,佩戴助听器儿童的母亲报告了更多的第三方残疾。含义:该研究仅包括母亲和有限数量的母亲,因此将研究结果推广到更大的人群可能不合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信