Evil in Classical German Philosophy

A. Wood
{"title":"Evil in Classical German Philosophy","authors":"A. Wood","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199915453.003.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter compares the accounts of evil will and evil moral psychology in Kant, Fichte, and Kierkegaard. For Kant, evil is the result of a free but ultimately incomprehensible choice on the part of rational agents to prefer self-advantage over the moral law when encountering others in society. For Fichte, evil may involve improperly giving in to natural drives, but it can also involve the giving oneself over to the pure drive to self-sufficiency. Both forms of evil manifest a self-deceptive obscurity and willful complacency that Fichte calls despair. Kierkegaard appropriates this notion of despair and incorporates it into his own more traditional (and less rationalist) picture of sin and redemption.","PeriodicalId":318625,"journal":{"name":"Evil","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199915453.003.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter compares the accounts of evil will and evil moral psychology in Kant, Fichte, and Kierkegaard. For Kant, evil is the result of a free but ultimately incomprehensible choice on the part of rational agents to prefer self-advantage over the moral law when encountering others in society. For Fichte, evil may involve improperly giving in to natural drives, but it can also involve the giving oneself over to the pure drive to self-sufficiency. Both forms of evil manifest a self-deceptive obscurity and willful complacency that Fichte calls despair. Kierkegaard appropriates this notion of despair and incorporates it into his own more traditional (and less rationalist) picture of sin and redemption.
德国古典哲学中的恶
本章比较了康德、费希特和克尔凯郭尔关于邪恶意志和邪恶道德心理的论述。对康德来说,邪恶是理性行为者在社会中与他人相遇时选择自我利益而非道德法则的自由但最终无法理解的选择的结果。对费希特来说,邪恶可能包括不恰当地屈服于自然冲动,但它也可能包括把自己交给纯粹的自给自足的冲动。这两种形式的邪恶都表现出一种自欺欺人的朦胧和任性的自满,费希特称之为绝望。克尔凯郭尔挪用了这种绝望的概念,并将其纳入他自己更传统的(不那么理性的)罪恶和救赎的图景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信