Electoral Violence and Political Instability in Nigeria: Implication for National Cohesion

Deinibiteim M.H., Samuel B.K.
{"title":"Electoral Violence and Political Instability in Nigeria: Implication for National Cohesion","authors":"Deinibiteim M.H., Samuel B.K.","doi":"10.52589/ajsshr-glpefe3g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nigeria had her first election in 1922 under the Clifford’s Constitution. Since then, under different dispensations, elections are held to fill various positions in both the legislative and executive arms of government. Elections in Nigeria are largely characterized with violence leading to loss of lives and wanton destruction of properties. Also, political parties are adorned with ethnic and regional colouration. Consequently, voters are largely ethnically and regionally biased in an attempt to put into office “one of their own.” This is the principal basis for the widespread electoral violence witnessed since independence in 1960. Successive governments have made frantic efforts to de-ethnicize and de-regionalize political contests and consequently achieve violence free and credible elections, particularly since the commencement of the Fourth Republic. These efforts have not achieved much in terms of stemming the occurrence of electoral violence. The corollary is fragmentation of the polity along ethno-religious and regional lines, thereby creating political instability and attendant inhibition of national cohesion since independence, six decades ago. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to show that electoral violence and the resultant political instability negatively affect national cohesion. The study adopted the State Compromise Paradigm to explain the need for sincerity among the political leaders of the different ethnic groups in the discharge of their duties and responsibilities in order to achieve national cohesion. The study relied mainly on secondary data focusing on political instability and weak national cohesion in the country. The study revealed that efforts at de-ethnicizing and de-regionalizing political contests as well as discouragement of violence in political contestation with ethno-religious bias had not yielded much positive results in the country. The paper concludes that unless and until electoral contestation in Nigeria is violence free, enduring political stability and national cohesion may remain unattainable. The study recommends, among other things, that state institutions should function for the benefit of all citizens, political leaders should avoid fanning the embers of ethnicity during elections and government should put in motion a sincere policy and programme for national cohesion.","PeriodicalId":363531,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research","volume":"281 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52589/ajsshr-glpefe3g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nigeria had her first election in 1922 under the Clifford’s Constitution. Since then, under different dispensations, elections are held to fill various positions in both the legislative and executive arms of government. Elections in Nigeria are largely characterized with violence leading to loss of lives and wanton destruction of properties. Also, political parties are adorned with ethnic and regional colouration. Consequently, voters are largely ethnically and regionally biased in an attempt to put into office “one of their own.” This is the principal basis for the widespread electoral violence witnessed since independence in 1960. Successive governments have made frantic efforts to de-ethnicize and de-regionalize political contests and consequently achieve violence free and credible elections, particularly since the commencement of the Fourth Republic. These efforts have not achieved much in terms of stemming the occurrence of electoral violence. The corollary is fragmentation of the polity along ethno-religious and regional lines, thereby creating political instability and attendant inhibition of national cohesion since independence, six decades ago. Thus, the main objective of this paper is to show that electoral violence and the resultant political instability negatively affect national cohesion. The study adopted the State Compromise Paradigm to explain the need for sincerity among the political leaders of the different ethnic groups in the discharge of their duties and responsibilities in order to achieve national cohesion. The study relied mainly on secondary data focusing on political instability and weak national cohesion in the country. The study revealed that efforts at de-ethnicizing and de-regionalizing political contests as well as discouragement of violence in political contestation with ethno-religious bias had not yielded much positive results in the country. The paper concludes that unless and until electoral contestation in Nigeria is violence free, enduring political stability and national cohesion may remain unattainable. The study recommends, among other things, that state institutions should function for the benefit of all citizens, political leaders should avoid fanning the embers of ethnicity during elections and government should put in motion a sincere policy and programme for national cohesion.
尼日利亚的选举暴力和政治不稳定:对国家凝聚力的影响
尼日利亚于1922年根据克利福德宪法举行了第一次选举。从那时起,在不同的制度下,举行选举以填补政府立法和行政部门的各种职位。尼日利亚选举的主要特点是暴力导致生命损失和肆意破坏财产。此外,政党也带有民族和地区色彩。因此,选民在很大程度上存在种族和地区偏见,试图让“自己人”上台。这是1960年独立以来普遍发生选举暴力的主要基础。历届政府都作出了疯狂的努力,使政治竞赛非种族化和非区域化,从而实现暴力、自由和可信的选举,特别是自第四共和国成立以来。这些努力在制止选举暴力的发生方面没有取得多大成就。其必然结果是政体沿着民族-宗教和区域界线分裂,从而造成政治不稳定,并随之抑制了自60年前独立以来的民族凝聚力。因此,本文的主要目的是表明选举暴力和由此产生的政治不稳定对民族凝聚力产生负面影响。该研究采用了国家妥协范式来解释不同族裔群体的政治领导人在履行其职责和责任以实现民族凝聚力时需要诚意。这项研究主要依靠二手数据,关注该国的政治不稳定和民族凝聚力薄弱。这项研究表明,在该国为政治竞争去种族化和去区域化以及在带有种族-宗教偏见的政治竞争中制止暴力所作的努力并没有产生多少积极的结果。该报告的结论是,除非尼日利亚的选举竞争没有暴力,否则持久的政治稳定和民族凝聚力可能仍然无法实现。该研究建议,除其他事项外,国家机构应为所有公民的利益而运作,政治领导人应避免在选举期间煽动种族成员,政府应推行一项促进民族凝聚力的真诚政策和方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信