Alternative reference evapotranspiration methods for the main climate types of the state of Paraná, Brazil

B. C. Gurski, D. Jerszurki, J. L. M. Souza
{"title":"Alternative reference evapotranspiration methods for the main climate types of the state of Paraná, Brazil","authors":"B. C. Gurski, D. Jerszurki, J. L. M. Souza","doi":"10.1590/s0100-204x2018000900003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The objective of this work was to define the best alternative methods for estimating the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in the main climatic types (Cfa and Cfb) of the state of Paraná, Brazil. The methods tested were Budyko, Camargo, Hargreaves-Samani, Linacre, and Thornthwaite, which were compared to the ETo calculated with the Penman-Monteith ASCE (EToPM) method, between 1986 and 2015, in eight meteorological stations. The performance of the alternative methods was obtained from the coefficient of determination (R2), index “d” of agreement, index “c” of performance, and root mean square error (RMSE). The Hargreaves-Samani method has a better performance in estimating the ETo for the main climatic types in the state of Paraná. The Camargo method allows smaller errors between the standard values of ETo, obtained with the Penman-Monteith method, and the estimated values. The methods of Thornthwaite, Linacre, and Budyko are not adequate to estimate the ETo in any climatic type of the state of Paraná, Brazil.","PeriodicalId":185886,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2018000900003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this work was to define the best alternative methods for estimating the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in the main climatic types (Cfa and Cfb) of the state of Paraná, Brazil. The methods tested were Budyko, Camargo, Hargreaves-Samani, Linacre, and Thornthwaite, which were compared to the ETo calculated with the Penman-Monteith ASCE (EToPM) method, between 1986 and 2015, in eight meteorological stations. The performance of the alternative methods was obtained from the coefficient of determination (R2), index “d” of agreement, index “c” of performance, and root mean square error (RMSE). The Hargreaves-Samani method has a better performance in estimating the ETo for the main climatic types in the state of Paraná. The Camargo method allows smaller errors between the standard values of ETo, obtained with the Penman-Monteith method, and the estimated values. The methods of Thornthwaite, Linacre, and Budyko are not adequate to estimate the ETo in any climatic type of the state of Paraná, Brazil.
巴西帕拉纳州主要气候类型的备选参考蒸散发方法
摘要:本研究的目的是确定巴西帕拉纳州主要气候类型(Cfa和Cfb)的参考蒸散发(ETo)的最佳替代方法。所测试的方法是Budyko、Camargo、Hargreaves-Samani、Linacre和Thornthwaite,并将其与1986年至2015年间8个气象站使用Penman-Monteith ASCE (EToPM)方法计算的ETo进行了比较。通过决定系数(R2)、一致性指标d、性能指标c和均方根误差(RMSE)得出各替代方法的性能。Hargreaves-Samani方法在估计帕拉纳州主要气候类型的ETo方面具有较好的效果。Camargo方法允许用Penman-Monteith方法获得的ETo标准值与估计值之间的误差较小。Thornthwaite, Linacre和Budyko的方法不足以估计巴西帕拉纳州任何气候类型的ETo。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信