{"title":"Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation dengan Asesmen Otentik terhadap Prestasi Belajar Dan Konsep Diri Siswa.","authors":"I. ., P. .. ', D. .. .","doi":"10.23887/jtpi.v8i2.2275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuanmenjelaskan perbedaan prestasi belajar (PB) dan konsep diri (KD) antara siswa yang belajar dengan model Group Investigation (MGI) dan asesmen otentik (AO), MGI,dan model pembelajaran konvensional (MPK). Penelitian eksperimen semu ini melibatkan 5 kelas siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Kubu Karangasem Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016 sebagai populasi. Tiga sampel ditentukan dengan teknik group random sampling (acak kelas), yaitu kelas VIIIE menggunakan MBI dengan AO, kelas VIIIB menggunakan MGI, dan VIIID menggunakan MPK. Data PB dikumpulkan dengan tes, sedangkan data KD dengan angket. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan MANCOVA dengan prestasi belajar dan konsep diri awal siswa berperan sebagai kovariabel. Setelah perlakuan dikontrol dengan PB dan KD awal siswa, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan PB IPA dan KD siswa antara yang belajar dengan MGI dengan AO, MGI, dan yang belajar dengan MPK. Baik PB IPA maupun KD siswa yang belajar dengan MGI dengan AO lebih baik dibandingkan dengan MGI dan MPK. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nKata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Asesmen otentik Pembelajaran Konvensional, Prestasi Belajar, Konsep Diri This study aims to explain the difference of students’ achievement (SA) and self concept (SC) among students learning with Group Investigation Model (GIM) and authentic assessment (AA), Group Investigation Model (GIM) and conventional learning models CLM). This quasi-experimental research involving 5 classe of grade VIII SMP Negeri 3 Kubu Karangasem in the year 2015/2016 as a population. Three classes as samples were determined by group random sampling technique, namely the class VIIIE using GIM with AA, VIIIB class using GIM, and VIIID using CLM. Data of the SA were collected by tests, while the SC by questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively and MANCOVA with prior SA and students’ SC as covariates. After the treatment was controlled by prior SA and students’ SC, the results of the study showed that there were significant differences of SA and SC among students learned with GIM with AA, GIM, and CLM. Both of SA and SC of student learned in GIM with AA is better than the GIM and as well as in the CLM.keyword : Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation, Assessment authentic, Conventional Learning, Learning Achievement, Self Concept","PeriodicalId":329417,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/jtpi.v8i2.2275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuanmenjelaskan perbedaan prestasi belajar (PB) dan konsep diri (KD) antara siswa yang belajar dengan model Group Investigation (MGI) dan asesmen otentik (AO), MGI,dan model pembelajaran konvensional (MPK). Penelitian eksperimen semu ini melibatkan 5 kelas siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Kubu Karangasem Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016 sebagai populasi. Tiga sampel ditentukan dengan teknik group random sampling (acak kelas), yaitu kelas VIIIE menggunakan MBI dengan AO, kelas VIIIB menggunakan MGI, dan VIIID menggunakan MPK. Data PB dikumpulkan dengan tes, sedangkan data KD dengan angket. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan MANCOVA dengan prestasi belajar dan konsep diri awal siswa berperan sebagai kovariabel. Setelah perlakuan dikontrol dengan PB dan KD awal siswa, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan PB IPA dan KD siswa antara yang belajar dengan MGI dengan AO, MGI, dan yang belajar dengan MPK. Baik PB IPA maupun KD siswa yang belajar dengan MGI dengan AO lebih baik dibandingkan dengan MGI dan MPK.
Kata Kunci : Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Group Investigation, Asesmen otentik Pembelajaran Konvensional, Prestasi Belajar, Konsep Diri This study aims to explain the difference of students’ achievement (SA) and self concept (SC) among students learning with Group Investigation Model (GIM) and authentic assessment (AA), Group Investigation Model (GIM) and conventional learning models CLM). This quasi-experimental research involving 5 classe of grade VIII SMP Negeri 3 Kubu Karangasem in the year 2015/2016 as a population. Three classes as samples were determined by group random sampling technique, namely the class VIIIE using GIM with AA, VIIIB class using GIM, and VIIID using CLM. Data of the SA were collected by tests, while the SC by questionnaire. Data were analyzed descriptively and MANCOVA with prior SA and students’ SC as covariates. After the treatment was controlled by prior SA and students’ SC, the results of the study showed that there were significant differences of SA and SC among students learned with GIM with AA, GIM, and CLM. Both of SA and SC of student learned in GIM with AA is better than the GIM and as well as in the CLM.keyword : Cooperative Learning Model Group Investigation, Assessment authentic, Conventional Learning, Learning Achievement, Self Concept
这项研究bertujuanmenjelaskan学习成就(PB)和自我概念的区别(KD)学习的学生与集团调查(MGI)模型和真实的评估(AO), MGI传统学习模式(MPK)。这个实验研究都涉及5年级VIII全国初中3年级学生为外郭Karangasem 2015/2016作为学期的人口。三个样本是由随机抽样技术指定的,即VIIIE班使用MBI与AO, VIIIB班使用MGI, VIIID使用MPK。PB数据收集与angket数据测试,而KD。数据进行描述性分析和早期学习和自我概念的成就MANCOVA学生扮演kovariabel。PB和KD开始控制学生待遇后,科学研究结果表明,有显著差异PB和KD学生之间的学习与MGI敖,MGI, MPK学习的。无论是科学PB KD学生更好的学习与MGI敖与MGI和MPK相比。关键词:小组合作学习模式调查,评估正宗传统的学习,学习成就,这个自我概念研究aims to解释学生之画”成就奖(SA)和赛尔夫理念(SC)》学生学习集团调查(健身房)模型和正宗的评估(AA),集团调查(健身房)模型和conventional学习models CLM)。这个quasi-experimental research involving 5 classe VIII全国初中3年级的阵营Karangasem在年度2015/2016美国人口。三个美国课堂技巧,namely抽样样本是随机intended由集团《用健身房的阶层VIIIE AA,用健身房VIIIB课,和用CLM VIIID。《SA是collected by测试数据,而《SC》由questionnaire。数据是analyzed descriptively和MANCOVA prior SA和美国学生“SC covariates。治疗是controlled by prior SA和之后的学生“SC, the results of study那里那有浓厚,在分歧的SA和SC》学生学会与AA,健身房,健身房和CLM。两者的SA》和学生学会在健身房SC AA比是健身房和《CLM as well as。keyword:合作学习小组调查,评估模型正宗的Conventional学习,学习成就奖,赛尔夫的理念