An Analysis of Higher-Order Thinking: Examining a Secondary Physics I Web-Enhanced Instructional Design.

L. C. Manley
{"title":"An Analysis of Higher-Order Thinking: Examining a Secondary Physics I Web-Enhanced Instructional Design.","authors":"L. C. Manley","doi":"10.2458/AZU_ITET_V1I1_MANLEY","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses a small-scale study assessing the extent to which the instructional design of a web-enhanced educational learning environment using the specific CMC discussion board tool facilitated higher-order thinking processes. The study was carried out in a secondary Physics I online module with 38 male and female high school students. Group discussion posts and final analyses data was coded and analyzed using the Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2001) Community of Inquiry (CoI) model. Two raters coded over 311 discussion messages using the cognitive presence categories and indicators to determine the level of higher-order thinking processes. Each message was given a number relating to the model’s categories: 1= triggering , 2= exploration , 3= integration , and 4= resolution , plus an additional category of 5= social to determine the level of social presence. Results determined that 8% of participant groups’ postings moved to higher levels of thinking processes through the use of authentic learning activities, CMC discussion board tool, and teacher presence, however 32% could not move beyond exploration. Over 43% of student postings scored in the social category, an increased result than previous studies in higher education. Data also indicated 19 out of 38 that is 50% of the participants were able to score in the higher-order thinking levels on their final analyses rather than in the discussion thread. Well-designed online learning modules offering learners authentic learning activities, CMC collaborative tools, prompting questions, and teacher presence must be accompanied with precise structured directives for secondary learners to achieve higher levels of critical thinking within collaborative discussion groups. DOI:  10.2458/azu_itet_v1i1_manley","PeriodicalId":173411,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Trends in Educational Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Trends in Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/AZU_ITET_V1I1_MANLEY","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper discusses a small-scale study assessing the extent to which the instructional design of a web-enhanced educational learning environment using the specific CMC discussion board tool facilitated higher-order thinking processes. The study was carried out in a secondary Physics I online module with 38 male and female high school students. Group discussion posts and final analyses data was coded and analyzed using the Garrison, Anderson, and Archer (2001) Community of Inquiry (CoI) model. Two raters coded over 311 discussion messages using the cognitive presence categories and indicators to determine the level of higher-order thinking processes. Each message was given a number relating to the model’s categories: 1= triggering , 2= exploration , 3= integration , and 4= resolution , plus an additional category of 5= social to determine the level of social presence. Results determined that 8% of participant groups’ postings moved to higher levels of thinking processes through the use of authentic learning activities, CMC discussion board tool, and teacher presence, however 32% could not move beyond exploration. Over 43% of student postings scored in the social category, an increased result than previous studies in higher education. Data also indicated 19 out of 38 that is 50% of the participants were able to score in the higher-order thinking levels on their final analyses rather than in the discussion thread. Well-designed online learning modules offering learners authentic learning activities, CMC collaborative tools, prompting questions, and teacher presence must be accompanied with precise structured directives for secondary learners to achieve higher levels of critical thinking within collaborative discussion groups. DOI:  10.2458/azu_itet_v1i1_manley
高阶思维分析:考察中学物理I网络强化教学设计。
本文讨论了一项小型研究,评估了使用特定CMC讨论板工具的网络增强教育学习环境的教学设计促进高阶思维过程的程度。该研究是在中学物理I在线模块中进行的,共有38名男女高中生。使用加里森、安德森和阿彻(2001)调查社区(CoI)模型对小组讨论帖子和最终分析数据进行编码和分析。两名评分员使用认知存在类别和指标对311条讨论信息进行编码,以确定高阶思维过程的水平。每个消息都有一个与模型类别相关的数字:1=触发,2=探索,3=整合,4=解决,再加上一个额外的类别5=社交,以确定社交存在的水平。结果表明,通过使用真实学习活动、CMC讨论板工具和老师的参与,8%的参与者小组的帖子进入了更高层次的思维过程,而32%的人无法超越探索。超过43%的学生帖子在社会类别中得分,比之前的高等教育研究结果有所增加。数据还显示,38名参与者中有19名,即50%的人能够在最终分析中获得更高层次的思维水平,而不是在讨论中。精心设计的在线学习模块为学习者提供真实的学习活动,CMC协作工具,提示问题和教师在场,必须伴随着精确的结构化指令,以便中学学习者在协作讨论小组中实现更高水平的批判性思维。DOI: 10.2458 / azu_itet_v1i1_manley
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信