Normal variations in MR venography that may cause pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis

Revin Kuruvilla Thomas, Elamparidhi Padmanaban, J. V. Raj, Avinesh Varadane, Pugazhendhi Sambath
{"title":"Normal variations in MR venography that may cause pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis","authors":"Revin Kuruvilla Thomas, Elamparidhi Padmanaban, J. V. Raj, Avinesh Varadane, Pugazhendhi Sambath","doi":"10.25259/gjhsr_14_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMagnetic resonance venography (MRV) is a widely used non-invasive imaging technique to diagnose cerebral dural venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and intracranial venous abnormalities. Non-visualization of a dural venous sinus is diagnostic of CVST on MRV. However, there are numerous common variances and technical aberrations on MRV that mimic filling defects and might be confused with CVST, making diagnosis difficult. These include aberrant veins and missing, hypoplastic or asymmetric venous sinuses. In addition, reconstruction artifacts might take the form of flow gaps with various lengths. The purpose of this study is to examine the occurrences, geographic distribution, and imaging properties of these variations and artifacts on MRV.\n\n\n\nAfter obtaining clearance from the Institution’s Ethics Committee, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain of 60 patients were taken for the study. MRI was performed using 1.5 Tesla Intera PHILIPS. A cross-sectional study was conducted to study the normal anatomy of the intracranial venous system and its normal variations.\n\n\n\nThis study showed that hypoplasia of the left transverse sinus was found to be more predominant (60%) among other sinuses of the brain followed by right transverse sinuses (31%); the left sigmoid sinus was hypoplastic in 35%, the right sigmoid sinus hypoplastic in 18% and superior sagittal sinuses in 5%.\n\n\n\nIt is essential to know the anatomical variations of the dural venous system for the discrimination between pathological processes such as thrombosis and physiologic conditions. Furthermore, the association of these variations with each other must be kept in mind for explanation of the presence of multiple variations in the same individuals.\n","PeriodicalId":369069,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/gjhsr_14_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) is a widely used non-invasive imaging technique to diagnose cerebral dural venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and intracranial venous abnormalities. Non-visualization of a dural venous sinus is diagnostic of CVST on MRV. However, there are numerous common variances and technical aberrations on MRV that mimic filling defects and might be confused with CVST, making diagnosis difficult. These include aberrant veins and missing, hypoplastic or asymmetric venous sinuses. In addition, reconstruction artifacts might take the form of flow gaps with various lengths. The purpose of this study is to examine the occurrences, geographic distribution, and imaging properties of these variations and artifacts on MRV. After obtaining clearance from the Institution’s Ethics Committee, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain of 60 patients were taken for the study. MRI was performed using 1.5 Tesla Intera PHILIPS. A cross-sectional study was conducted to study the normal anatomy of the intracranial venous system and its normal variations. This study showed that hypoplasia of the left transverse sinus was found to be more predominant (60%) among other sinuses of the brain followed by right transverse sinuses (31%); the left sigmoid sinus was hypoplastic in 35%, the right sigmoid sinus hypoplastic in 18% and superior sagittal sinuses in 5%. It is essential to know the anatomical variations of the dural venous system for the discrimination between pathological processes such as thrombosis and physiologic conditions. Furthermore, the association of these variations with each other must be kept in mind for explanation of the presence of multiple variations in the same individuals.
磁共振静脉造影的正常变化可能导致脑静脉窦血栓形成的诊断缺陷
磁共振静脉造影(MRV)是一种广泛应用于诊断硬脑膜静脉窦血栓形成(CVST)和颅内静脉异常的无创成像技术。硬脑膜静脉窦在MRV上不可见是CVST的诊断。然而,MRV上有许多常见的变异和技术畸变,它们模仿填充缺陷,可能与CVST混淆,使诊断变得困难。这些包括静脉异常和静脉窦缺失、发育不良或不对称。此外,重建工件可能采用不同长度的流间隙的形式。本研究的目的是研究这些变异和伪影在MRV上的发生、地理分布和成像特性。在获得该研究所伦理委员会的批准后,对60名患者的大脑进行了核磁共振成像(MRI)研究。采用1.5 Tesla Intera PHILIPS进行MRI检查。横断面研究研究颅内静脉系统的正常解剖及其正常变化。本研究显示,在其他脑窦中,左横窦发育不全更为突出(60%),其次是右横窦(31%);左乙状窦发育不全占35%,右乙状窦发育不全占18%,上矢状窦发育不全占5%。了解硬脑膜静脉系统的解剖变化是区分血栓形成等病理过程和生理条件的必要条件。此外,为了解释同一个体中存在的多种变异,必须记住这些变异之间的相互关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信