Genotype X Environment Interaction for Quality Traits in Bread Wheat Genotype Tested At Six Environments

{"title":"Genotype X Environment Interaction for Quality Traits in Bread Wheat Genotype\nTested At Six Environments","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/anfs.04.02.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of GEI and its magnitude on the grain quality of bread wheat genotypes in\nEthiopia. 15 bread wheat genotypes were evaluated using RCBD with four replications at six different locations in Ethiopia\nduring 2017/18 cropping season. Combine Analysis of variance showed highly significant (P<0.001) differences among\ngenotype, environment and GEI for investigated quality traits except GEI shows non-significant difference in dry gluten and\ngluten index. The environment contributed more than 50% only in PC (83.6%) and HLW (56.1%). The three components,\nG, E and GxE made almost similar contribution to most of the quality traits (WG, DG and GI), although the contribution\nof the environment was a little higher. Hardness index was determined mainly by the genotype (69.3%). The contribution\nof GxE was higher than that of genotype in all quality traits except in HDI and GI, again indicating the important role of\nGxE in the determination of wheat quality traits. Genotype ETBW9045 and ETBW8065 gave the best value of protein in\nthe favorable means (15.05% and 14.75%) respectively. The Hidase had the highest value of wet gluten (58.2%) and dry\ngluten (24.38%) in average for all investigated locations (58.2%). GGE biplot declared ETBW9045 (#10) and ETBW8065\n(#6) genotypes as stable in all quality. These two genotypes ETBW9045 (#10) and ETBW8065 (#6) are recommended for\nwide adaptation and for crossing. This study demonstrates success in wheat breeding for improved quality in bread wheat.\nThe study also provides information on the combined stability of improved quality of the nationally important bread wheat\ngenotypes. Therefore, the results of this study could be valuable for national bread wheat breeding programs to develop\nnew varieties with high stable grain quality.","PeriodicalId":173678,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nutrition & Food Science","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/anfs.04.02.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of GEI and its magnitude on the grain quality of bread wheat genotypes in Ethiopia. 15 bread wheat genotypes were evaluated using RCBD with four replications at six different locations in Ethiopia during 2017/18 cropping season. Combine Analysis of variance showed highly significant (P<0.001) differences among genotype, environment and GEI for investigated quality traits except GEI shows non-significant difference in dry gluten and gluten index. The environment contributed more than 50% only in PC (83.6%) and HLW (56.1%). The three components, G, E and GxE made almost similar contribution to most of the quality traits (WG, DG and GI), although the contribution of the environment was a little higher. Hardness index was determined mainly by the genotype (69.3%). The contribution of GxE was higher than that of genotype in all quality traits except in HDI and GI, again indicating the important role of GxE in the determination of wheat quality traits. Genotype ETBW9045 and ETBW8065 gave the best value of protein in the favorable means (15.05% and 14.75%) respectively. The Hidase had the highest value of wet gluten (58.2%) and dry gluten (24.38%) in average for all investigated locations (58.2%). GGE biplot declared ETBW9045 (#10) and ETBW8065 (#6) genotypes as stable in all quality. These two genotypes ETBW9045 (#10) and ETBW8065 (#6) are recommended for wide adaptation and for crossing. This study demonstrates success in wheat breeding for improved quality in bread wheat. The study also provides information on the combined stability of improved quality of the nationally important bread wheat genotypes. Therefore, the results of this study could be valuable for national bread wheat breeding programs to develop new varieties with high stable grain quality.
6种环境下面包小麦品质性状的基因型X环境互作
本研究旨在评价GEI及其大小对埃塞俄比亚面包小麦基因型籽粒品质的影响。在2017/18种植季,使用RCBD在埃塞俄比亚6个不同地点进行了4个重复,对15种面包小麦基因型进行了评估。综合方差分析显示,除干面筋和谷蛋白指数在基因型、环境和GEI之间差异不显著外,其他品质性状在GEI之间差异极显著(P<0.001)。只有PC(83.6%)和HLW(56.1%)的环境贡献率超过50%。G、E和GxE对大部分品质性状(WG、DG和GI)的贡献基本一致,但环境的贡献略高。硬度指数主要由基因型决定(69.3%)。除HDI和GI外,GxE对所有品质性状的贡献均高于基因型,再次说明GxE在小麦品质性状的决定中起着重要作用。基因型ETBW9045和ETBW8065的蛋白质含量最高,分别为15.05%和14.75%。湿面筋含量最高(58.2%),干面筋含量平均为24.38%(58.2%)。GGE双标图显示ETBW9045(#10)和ETBW8065(#6)基因型在所有质量上都是稳定的。这两个基因型ETBW9045(#10)和ETBW8065(#6)被推荐用于广泛适应和杂交。本研究证明了面包小麦品质改良育种的成功。该研究还提供了国家重要面包小麦基因型改良质量的综合稳定性信息。因此,本研究结果可为国家面包小麦选育计划提供参考,以培育品质稳定的面包小麦新品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信