Comparison of CsI coated carbon velvet and aluminum cathodes operated at current density on the order of 300 A/cm2

C. Lynn, J. Walter, A. Neuber, J. Dickens, M. Kristiansen
{"title":"Comparison of CsI coated carbon velvet and aluminum cathodes operated at current density on the order of 300 A/cm2","authors":"C. Lynn, J. Walter, A. Neuber, J. Dickens, M. Kristiansen","doi":"10.1109/IPMHVC.2012.6518859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many high power microwave devices use explosive or flashover electron emission cathodes in order to generate the electron beam and thus drive the device. These diodes are simple to operate, requiring no heater or other external systems, and are capable of generating beam currents of several kA at accelerating voltages on the order of 100s of kV. However, they generally suffer from non-uniform emission, anode heating, out-gassing, and pulse shortening due to anode and cathode plasma expansion. The ability to rep-rate such a diode is generally limited by anode heating and out-gassing which are both affected by beam uniformity. Two diodes are compared in this work. One uses a machined aluminum cathode, which is made from solid aluminum with grooves milled onto the surface. The other diode utilizes a carbon velvet cathode which is CVD coated with CsI. Time integrated scintillator images of the electron beam at the anode were taken for both the carbon velvet and aluminum cathodes. Additionally, time resolved images of the emission centers were taken for the carbon velvet cathodes. Data sets of over 1000 shots were taken with each cathode and shot to shot variation in the peak “turn-on” electric field are compared. The lifetime of the aluminum cathode was exceeded before 1000 shots, whereas the carbon velvet cathode showed no degradation in operation.","PeriodicalId":228441,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference (IPMHVC)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE International Power Modulator and High Voltage Conference (IPMHVC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPMHVC.2012.6518859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many high power microwave devices use explosive or flashover electron emission cathodes in order to generate the electron beam and thus drive the device. These diodes are simple to operate, requiring no heater or other external systems, and are capable of generating beam currents of several kA at accelerating voltages on the order of 100s of kV. However, they generally suffer from non-uniform emission, anode heating, out-gassing, and pulse shortening due to anode and cathode plasma expansion. The ability to rep-rate such a diode is generally limited by anode heating and out-gassing which are both affected by beam uniformity. Two diodes are compared in this work. One uses a machined aluminum cathode, which is made from solid aluminum with grooves milled onto the surface. The other diode utilizes a carbon velvet cathode which is CVD coated with CsI. Time integrated scintillator images of the electron beam at the anode were taken for both the carbon velvet and aluminum cathodes. Additionally, time resolved images of the emission centers were taken for the carbon velvet cathodes. Data sets of over 1000 shots were taken with each cathode and shot to shot variation in the peak “turn-on” electric field are compared. The lifetime of the aluminum cathode was exceeded before 1000 shots, whereas the carbon velvet cathode showed no degradation in operation.
在电流密度为300 A/cm2左右时,CsI涂层碳天鹅绒阴极与铝阴极的比较
许多高功率微波器件使用爆炸或闪络电子发射阴极来产生电子束,从而驱动器件。这些二极管操作简单,不需要加热器或其他外部系统,并且能够在100千伏的加速电压下产生几kA的光束电流。然而,由于阳极和阴极等离子体膨胀,它们通常存在发射不均匀、阳极加热、出气和脉冲缩短等问题。再现这种二极管的能力通常受到阳极加热和排气的限制,这两者都受到光束均匀性的影响。本文对两种二极管进行了比较。一种是用机械加工的铝阴极,它是由固体铝制成的,表面上有凹槽。另一个二极管利用碳天鹅绒阴极,这是CVD涂层与CsI。对碳天鹅绒和铝阴极的阳极电子束进行了时间积分闪烁成像。此外,还对碳天鹅绒阴极的发射中心进行了时间分辨成像。每个阴极都采集了超过1000次的数据集,并比较了每个阴极的峰值“开启”电场的变化。铝阴极在1000次射击前就超过了寿命,而碳天鹅绒阴极在使用中没有出现退化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信