Economics of host-plant resistance.

D. Onstad
{"title":"Economics of host-plant resistance.","authors":"D. Onstad","doi":"10.1079/9781786393678.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n Host-plant resistance (HPR) has been declared the foundation of integrated pest management (IPM), which is compatible with all strategies and integrated tactics. However, there is bias in publications about HPR. Most published studies highlight positive results with research and development. Very few crop varieties reach field trials unless they show harvestable yields similar to those of older varieties. And then the value of a variety, that may yield more under high pest pressure because of resistance to pests, still must be shown to be economical in most situations faced by farmers. Otherwise, farmers will prefer higher yields in most years with older crop varieties with protection provided by some other IPM tactic in the years with high pest pressure. Thus, a survey of publications will likely not cover the costs of failures and limited successes, leading to biased views in favour of HPR. This chapter shows that most of the published cases support the view that resistance by crops against insects is valuable over decades, not just single growing seasons. When the costs of HPR research and development have been estimated, the benefits exceed the costs over 10-20 years. These results should encourage others to continue the research and to take the extra steps to demonstrate the benefits to farmers and society.","PeriodicalId":187132,"journal":{"name":"The economics of integrated pest management of insects","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The economics of integrated pest management of insects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/9781786393678.0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Host-plant resistance (HPR) has been declared the foundation of integrated pest management (IPM), which is compatible with all strategies and integrated tactics. However, there is bias in publications about HPR. Most published studies highlight positive results with research and development. Very few crop varieties reach field trials unless they show harvestable yields similar to those of older varieties. And then the value of a variety, that may yield more under high pest pressure because of resistance to pests, still must be shown to be economical in most situations faced by farmers. Otherwise, farmers will prefer higher yields in most years with older crop varieties with protection provided by some other IPM tactic in the years with high pest pressure. Thus, a survey of publications will likely not cover the costs of failures and limited successes, leading to biased views in favour of HPR. This chapter shows that most of the published cases support the view that resistance by crops against insects is valuable over decades, not just single growing seasons. When the costs of HPR research and development have been estimated, the benefits exceed the costs over 10-20 years. These results should encourage others to continue the research and to take the extra steps to demonstrate the benefits to farmers and society.
寄主-植物抗性经济学。
摘要寄主-植物抗性(HPR)是害虫综合防治(IPM)的基础,与各种防治策略和综合对策相适应。然而,关于HPR的出版物存在偏见。大多数发表的研究都强调了研究和开发的积极成果。很少有作物品种能够进行田间试验,除非它们显示出与老品种相似的可收获产量。然后,一个品种的价值,可能在高虫害压力下产量更高,因为对害虫有抵抗力,仍然必须证明在农民面临的大多数情况下是经济的。否则,在虫害压力较大的年份,农民将倾向于采用较老的作物品种,在其他一些IPM策略提供保护,从而在大多数年份获得更高的产量。因此,对出版物的调查很可能不包括失败的成本和有限的成功,从而导致有利于人力资源管理的偏见观点。这一章表明,大多数已发表的案例都支持这样一种观点,即作物对昆虫的抗性在几十年内是有价值的,而不仅仅是在单一的生长季节。如果对HPR的研发成本进行估算,那么在10-20年内,收益将超过成本。这些结果应该鼓励其他人继续研究,并采取额外的步骤来证明对农民和社会的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信