Performance Comparison between PI based Control and Model Predictive Control of Voltage Source Inverter under Load Variations

Sujoy Bhowmik, P. Gayen, A. Mitra
{"title":"Performance Comparison between PI based Control and Model Predictive Control of Voltage Source Inverter under Load Variations","authors":"Sujoy Bhowmik, P. Gayen, A. Mitra","doi":"10.1109/EDKCON56221.2022.10032916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Now-a-days, advancement of control logic for DC-AC converter, i.e., an inverter become important in stand-alone applications. This converter is essential for multi-purposes, such as, to convert outputs of different renewable sources, to provide variable frequency and/or voltage for industrial motor-drive system, to provide back-up power supply etc. In the applications, proper selection of controller is very much essential for achieving improved dynamic performance of inverter. In this regard, different control logics for three-phase two level voltage source inverter have been examined. Here, comparative studies between conventional closed loop current control using proportional-integral (PI) regulator and model predictive current control method have been done under variable loading conditions on inverter. This is appearing from observations of various studies that dynamic behaviours of load current have been enhanced in case of model predictive control (MPC) than that of PI controller based logic. Also, harmonic distortion in load current is reduced under MPC logic.","PeriodicalId":296883,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference of Electron Devices Society Kolkata Chapter (EDKCON)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference of Electron Devices Society Kolkata Chapter (EDKCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDKCON56221.2022.10032916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Now-a-days, advancement of control logic for DC-AC converter, i.e., an inverter become important in stand-alone applications. This converter is essential for multi-purposes, such as, to convert outputs of different renewable sources, to provide variable frequency and/or voltage for industrial motor-drive system, to provide back-up power supply etc. In the applications, proper selection of controller is very much essential for achieving improved dynamic performance of inverter. In this regard, different control logics for three-phase two level voltage source inverter have been examined. Here, comparative studies between conventional closed loop current control using proportional-integral (PI) regulator and model predictive current control method have been done under variable loading conditions on inverter. This is appearing from observations of various studies that dynamic behaviours of load current have been enhanced in case of model predictive control (MPC) than that of PI controller based logic. Also, harmonic distortion in load current is reduced under MPC logic.
负载变化下基于PI控制与模型预测控制的电压源逆变器性能比较
如今,DC-AC变换器(即逆变器)的控制逻辑的进步在单机应用中变得非常重要。该转换器具有多种用途,如转换不同可再生能源的输出,为工业电机驱动系统提供变频和/或电压,提供备用电源等。在实际应用中,控制器的合理选择对提高逆变器的动态性能至关重要。在这方面,研究了三相两电平电压源逆变器的不同控制逻辑。本文在变负载条件下,对传统的比例积分(PI)调节器闭环电流控制与模型预测电流控制方法进行了对比研究。这是从各种研究的观察中出现的,在模型预测控制(MPC)的情况下,负载电流的动态行为比基于逻辑的PI控制器的动态行为得到了增强。在MPC逻辑下,负载电流中的谐波失真也减小了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信