{"title":"Religion, the secular and the left","authors":"D. Grayson, T. Walker","doi":"10.3898/soun.73.05.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines four common ways that religion and faith are managed within left-wing organising. The first (indifference) sees 'religion' and 'faith' as a set of traditional practices that will naturally disappear as modernity prevails. The second (hostility) sees religion in\n terms of oppressive institutions which need to be excised from public life. The third (limited welcome) takes religion as a racial category, highlighting links between Christian-Secular supremacy and colonial domination, but does not engage with religious content. The fourth (incorporation)\n recognises that spiritual practices can sustain collectives in effectively challenging oppression. These approaches are discussed through two contrasting examples of leftist organising. The first is Southall Black Sisters, for whom challenging patriarchy includes challenging its expression\n in religious institutions, and secular spaces are seen as a necessary part of creating collectives. The second is the role of spirituality and religion in community responses to the Grenfell fire – in particular the shared walking in silence; this has been crucial to the community's\n ability to maintain strength and experience solidarity in the face of incredible and ongoing injustice. In trying to understand how the left should go about building solidarities and alliances, the authors assert the value of localised and contingent readings of 'religion' and 'the secular'.","PeriodicalId":403400,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: a journal of politics and culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.73.05.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article outlines four common ways that religion and faith are managed within left-wing organising. The first (indifference) sees 'religion' and 'faith' as a set of traditional practices that will naturally disappear as modernity prevails. The second (hostility) sees religion in
terms of oppressive institutions which need to be excised from public life. The third (limited welcome) takes religion as a racial category, highlighting links between Christian-Secular supremacy and colonial domination, but does not engage with religious content. The fourth (incorporation)
recognises that spiritual practices can sustain collectives in effectively challenging oppression. These approaches are discussed through two contrasting examples of leftist organising. The first is Southall Black Sisters, for whom challenging patriarchy includes challenging its expression
in religious institutions, and secular spaces are seen as a necessary part of creating collectives. The second is the role of spirituality and religion in community responses to the Grenfell fire – in particular the shared walking in silence; this has been crucial to the community's
ability to maintain strength and experience solidarity in the face of incredible and ongoing injustice. In trying to understand how the left should go about building solidarities and alliances, the authors assert the value of localised and contingent readings of 'religion' and 'the secular'.
这篇文章概述了左翼组织管理宗教和信仰的四种常见方式。第一种(冷漠)将“宗教”和“信仰”视为一套传统习俗,随着现代性的盛行,它们将自然消失。第二种(敌意)认为宗教是压迫性的机构,需要从公共生活中剔除。第三种(有限的欢迎)将宗教作为一个种族范畴,强调基督教-世俗霸权和殖民统治之间的联系,但不涉及宗教内容。第四(合并)认识到精神实践可以维持集体有效地挑战压迫。这些方法是通过左派组织的两个对比例子来讨论的。第一个是Southall Black Sisters,对她们来说,挑战父权制包括挑战其在宗教机构中的表达,而世俗空间被视为创造集体的必要组成部分。第二个是精神和宗教在社区对格伦费尔火灾的反应中所起的作用——特别是在寂静中共同行走;这对于社区在面对难以置信和持续的不公正时保持力量和团结的能力至关重要。在试图理解左派应该如何建立团结和联盟的过程中,作者强调了对“宗教”和“世俗”的本地化和偶然解读的价值。