Research and Development Evaluation Remodelling in Malaysia: An Idealistic Framework

N. Osman, A. Nura
{"title":"Research and Development Evaluation Remodelling in Malaysia: An Idealistic Framework","authors":"N. Osman, A. Nura","doi":"10.32890/jbma2014.4.0.8878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an idealistic conceptual framework for Research & Development(R&D) evaluation. R&D is very important in higher level decision making. In Malaysia,though the spending is on increasing term, only a small proportionate of Gross DomesticProduct (GDP) is allocated to fund R&D as compared to the required tasks in the vastfields of research. A lot of efforts were spent in R&D, the undertakings of which shouldbe monitored and well-funded to ensure the results of the research are consideredin making decisions that could be shared, implemented, improvised, and evaluated.Public research which focuses more on educational know-how in the developmentof human resource/human capital could be assimilated in R&D of private sectorswhich focus more on scientific, technology, material handling, and information andcommunication technology (ICT). The more advances occur in science and technologyfields, the demand for manpower in the related fields would increase. In spite of this,any improvement from the implemented research result could not be assured even withfunctional R&D systems if there is no constant evaluation and post decision valuation.The collaboration of public-private R&D institutions would generate a new breedof innovative entrepreneurs that could assist Malaysia to achieve developed nationstatus as set out in Vision 2020. The outcome of this paper is a proposed model ofthe Malaysian R&D evaluation in public agencies, private sectors, and universities toconstruct an idealistic R&D decision evaluation framework for future application. Themodel presents the interconnected interactions that take place within the stakeholderscircle in R&D network. Basically, the model is drawn up under the principle thatvirtually there are balanced interactions and the interested parties are inter-related.","PeriodicalId":410080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Management and Accounting","volume":"325 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Management and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2014.4.0.8878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides an idealistic conceptual framework for Research & Development(R&D) evaluation. R&D is very important in higher level decision making. In Malaysia,though the spending is on increasing term, only a small proportionate of Gross DomesticProduct (GDP) is allocated to fund R&D as compared to the required tasks in the vastfields of research. A lot of efforts were spent in R&D, the undertakings of which shouldbe monitored and well-funded to ensure the results of the research are consideredin making decisions that could be shared, implemented, improvised, and evaluated.Public research which focuses more on educational know-how in the developmentof human resource/human capital could be assimilated in R&D of private sectorswhich focus more on scientific, technology, material handling, and information andcommunication technology (ICT). The more advances occur in science and technologyfields, the demand for manpower in the related fields would increase. In spite of this,any improvement from the implemented research result could not be assured even withfunctional R&D systems if there is no constant evaluation and post decision valuation.The collaboration of public-private R&D institutions would generate a new breedof innovative entrepreneurs that could assist Malaysia to achieve developed nationstatus as set out in Vision 2020. The outcome of this paper is a proposed model ofthe Malaysian R&D evaluation in public agencies, private sectors, and universities toconstruct an idealistic R&D decision evaluation framework for future application. Themodel presents the interconnected interactions that take place within the stakeholderscircle in R&D network. Basically, the model is drawn up under the principle thatvirtually there are balanced interactions and the interested parties are inter-related.
马来西亚的研发评估重塑:一个理想主义框架
本文为研究与开发(R&D)评价提供了一个理想的概念框架。研发在高层决策中非常重要。在马来西亚,虽然支出在不断增加,但与广阔的研究领域所需的任务相比,国内生产总值(GDP)中只有一小部分用于资助研发。我们在研发方面投入了大量的努力,这些工作应该得到监测和充足的资助,以确保在做出可以共享、实施、即兴发挥和评估的决策时考虑到研究结果。在人力资源/人力资本发展方面,更注重教育知识的公共研究可以被更注重科学、技术、物料处理和信息和通信技术(ICT)的私营部门的研发所吸收。科学技术领域的进步越多,相关领域对人力的需求就会增加。尽管如此,如果没有持续的评估和决策后评估,即使有功能研发系统,也不能保证实施的研究成果的任何改进。公私研发机构的合作将产生一批新的创新企业家,帮助马来西亚实现2020年愿景所规定的发达国家地位。本文提出了马来西亚公共机构、私营部门和大学的研发评估模型,为未来的应用构建一个理想的研发决策评估框架。该模型描述了研发网络中利益相关者圈内部的相互作用。基本上,该模式是在实际存在平衡互动和利益相关方相互关联的原则下制定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信