Evolution of organizational development and personnel management

V. Savenko, Olena Demydova, Inna Shatrova, T. Honcharenko, Tamara Liashchenko
{"title":"Evolution of organizational development and personnel management","authors":"V. Savenko, Olena Demydova, Inna Shatrova, T. Honcharenko, Tamara Liashchenko","doi":"10.32347/2412-9933.2023.53.91-99","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of organizing action is hidden in the term \"production\". And we will\n make the formula more precise: the organization of the external forces of nature, the\n organization of human forces, the organization of experience. Humanity has no activity\n other than organizational, there are no tasks other than organizational. Therefore, all\n interests of humanity are organizational. And from this it follows: there cannot and\n should not be another point of view on life and the world, except for the organizational\n one. And if this is not yet recognized, it is only because people's thinking has not yet\n completely broken out of the shells of fetishism, enveloped in it on the way of\n development. The life of a person and a team is a chain of posing - solving problems.\n The main, overwhelming obstacle here lies in their incredible heterogeneity. The variety\n and variety of tasks at the current state of organizational experience and knowledge\n means specialized and different approaches to them. In the general scheme, the whole\n meaning of human life unfolded before us, and now we can sum up. The old teacher of\n scientific socialism F. Engels expressed them with the formula: production of people,\n production of things, production of ideas. It is also not accidental that a person\n should learn from Nature and the Higher Mind, because the systems created by Nature (for\n example, families of organized animals) are far superior in their perfection to the\n systems created by man. The genome of perfection is a natural creation, and man still\n needs to work a lot on himself to achieve even known systems created by Nature, not to\n mention supra-conceptual management and activity at levels higher than the human level\n of mind at this stage of human development. The problem of studying and improving\n organizations as intellectual artificially created systems is much younger than the\n organizations themselves, but it has been going on since ancient times. The improvement\n of organizations will continue without end as long as humanity exists, because there are\n no limits to perfection. Another thing is that our development and perfection are beyond\n our comfort. The main measure of the value of any scientific and technical achievements\n is practice.","PeriodicalId":321731,"journal":{"name":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Development of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2023.53.91-99","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of organizing action is hidden in the term "production". And we will make the formula more precise: the organization of the external forces of nature, the organization of human forces, the organization of experience. Humanity has no activity other than organizational, there are no tasks other than organizational. Therefore, all interests of humanity are organizational. And from this it follows: there cannot and should not be another point of view on life and the world, except for the organizational one. And if this is not yet recognized, it is only because people's thinking has not yet completely broken out of the shells of fetishism, enveloped in it on the way of development. The life of a person and a team is a chain of posing - solving problems. The main, overwhelming obstacle here lies in their incredible heterogeneity. The variety and variety of tasks at the current state of organizational experience and knowledge means specialized and different approaches to them. In the general scheme, the whole meaning of human life unfolded before us, and now we can sum up. The old teacher of scientific socialism F. Engels expressed them with the formula: production of people, production of things, production of ideas. It is also not accidental that a person should learn from Nature and the Higher Mind, because the systems created by Nature (for example, families of organized animals) are far superior in their perfection to the systems created by man. The genome of perfection is a natural creation, and man still needs to work a lot on himself to achieve even known systems created by Nature, not to mention supra-conceptual management and activity at levels higher than the human level of mind at this stage of human development. The problem of studying and improving organizations as intellectual artificially created systems is much younger than the organizations themselves, but it has been going on since ancient times. The improvement of organizations will continue without end as long as humanity exists, because there are no limits to perfection. Another thing is that our development and perfection are beyond our comfort. The main measure of the value of any scientific and technical achievements is practice.
组织发展与人事管理的演变
组织行动的概念隐藏在“生产”一词中。我们将使公式更精确:自然外部力量的组织,人类力量的组织,经验的组织。人类没有不组织的活动,没有不组织的任务。因此,人类的一切利益都是组织性的。由此可以得出结论:除了组织的观点之外,不可能也不应该有另一种对生活和世界的观点。如果这一点还没有被认识到,那只是因为人们的思维还没有完全冲破拜物教的外壳,在发展的道路上被它所笼罩。一个人和一个团队的生活就是一连串提出问题-解决问题的过程。这里主要的、压倒性的障碍在于它们令人难以置信的异质性。在组织经验和知识的当前状态下,任务的多样性和多样性意味着专业化和不同的方法。在总体方案中,人类生命的全部意义展现在我们面前,现在我们可以总结了。科学社会主义的老老师恩格斯用这样的公式来表达它们:生产人,生产物,生产思想。一个人应该向大自然和更高的心灵学习也不是偶然的,因为大自然创造的系统(例如,有组织的动物家庭)在完善方面远远优于人类创造的系统。完美的基因组是一种自然的创造,人类仍然需要在自己身上付出很多努力,才能实现自然创造的已知系统,更不用说在人类发展的这个阶段,在高于人类思维水平的水平上进行超概念管理和活动。把组织作为人工创造的智能系统来研究和改进,这个问题比组织本身要年轻得多,但它自古以来就存在。只要人类存在,组织的改进就会永无止境,因为完美是没有极限的。另一件事是,我们的发展和完善超出了我们的舒适。任何科学技术成果价值的主要衡量标准是实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信