'Adamas Mourned by the Nymphs' in Schedel's 'Liber Antiquitatum'

Alice Wolf
{"title":"'Adamas Mourned by the Nymphs' in Schedel's 'Liber Antiquitatum'","authors":"Alice Wolf","doi":"10.2307/750035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Critics usually consider it a psychological finesse of Michelangelo that the quiet and motionless grief of his Madonna in St. Peter's is contrasted with the 'speaking' gesture of her left hand.' Astounding though it may seem, it has never been noticed that the four fingers of this hand are not by the master. This is not only clearly visible in the original, but it is also confirmed by a document, which states that they were made in 1736 by GiuseppeLironi: \"2o December 1736. Scudi 9 moneta per tant' importa un suo conto di aver rifatto le quattro dita alla mano sinistra della Maria SS.ma della PietA.\"2 Engravings and replicas of the group dating from the I6th century make it possible to reconstruct the original position of the fingers.3 They were half-bent and nearer together, forming a spatial unity with the palm so that they were enclosed in the borders of the marble block. This is a gesture of resignation and submission to fate, whereas the hand as it appears to-day with the pointing forefinger has a rhetorical meaning with an appeal to the onlooker. The position and expression of the original hand was very akin to the left hand of Christ in Leonardo's Last Supper. And here we come upon one of the paradoxes of modern art criticism. Justi was the first to call attention to the resemblance of the two hands, and his observation was 'blindly' repeated by a number of other people.4 But what they were commenting upon was not the original hand of the Pieta' but the i8th century restoration. Justi and his fellow critics became victims of too good a knowledge of the High Renaissance : in identifying the hand of the Pieth with that of Leonardo's Christ they unconsciously read into the baroque movement the original self-contained gesture. R.W.","PeriodicalId":410128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1938-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Warburg Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/750035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Critics usually consider it a psychological finesse of Michelangelo that the quiet and motionless grief of his Madonna in St. Peter's is contrasted with the 'speaking' gesture of her left hand.' Astounding though it may seem, it has never been noticed that the four fingers of this hand are not by the master. This is not only clearly visible in the original, but it is also confirmed by a document, which states that they were made in 1736 by GiuseppeLironi: "2o December 1736. Scudi 9 moneta per tant' importa un suo conto di aver rifatto le quattro dita alla mano sinistra della Maria SS.ma della PietA."2 Engravings and replicas of the group dating from the I6th century make it possible to reconstruct the original position of the fingers.3 They were half-bent and nearer together, forming a spatial unity with the palm so that they were enclosed in the borders of the marble block. This is a gesture of resignation and submission to fate, whereas the hand as it appears to-day with the pointing forefinger has a rhetorical meaning with an appeal to the onlooker. The position and expression of the original hand was very akin to the left hand of Christ in Leonardo's Last Supper. And here we come upon one of the paradoxes of modern art criticism. Justi was the first to call attention to the resemblance of the two hands, and his observation was 'blindly' repeated by a number of other people.4 But what they were commenting upon was not the original hand of the Pieta' but the i8th century restoration. Justi and his fellow critics became victims of too good a knowledge of the High Renaissance : in identifying the hand of the Pieth with that of Leonardo's Christ they unconsciously read into the baroque movement the original self-contained gesture. R.W.
谢德尔的《古书》中的“阿达玛斯被仙女们哀悼”
批评家们通常认为这是米开朗基罗的一种心理技巧,他在圣彼得教堂画的圣母的安静和静止的悲伤与她左手的“说话”姿势形成对比。虽然这看起来令人震惊,但从来没有人注意到这只手的四个手指不是大师的。这不仅在原件中清晰可见,而且在一份文件中也得到了证实,该文件指出它们是由GiuseppeLironi于1736年制作的:“1736年12月20日。Scudi(意大利)第9号:“我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是说,我的意思是我的意思。”这群人的雕刻和复制品可以追溯到16世纪,这使得重建手指的原始位置成为可能它们半弯着,靠得更近,与手掌形成一个空间的统一,这样它们就被包围在大理石块的边缘里了。这是一种顺从命运的手势,而今天伸出食指的手则有一种修辞意义,是对旁观者的一种呼吁。原作手的位置和表情与达芬奇画作《最后的晚餐》中耶稣的左手非常相似。在这里,我们遇到了现代艺术批评的一个悖论。贾斯提是第一个注意到两只手的相似之处的人,他的观察被许多其他人“盲目地”重复但是他们所评论的并不是圣母殇的原作,而是18世纪的修复作品。贾斯提和他的评论家同行们对文艺复兴盛期的了解太过深入,成为了他们的牺牲品:在将耶稣的手与列奥纳多的耶稣的手相鉴别时,他们不自觉地将巴洛克运动中原始的独立姿态解读了出来。前作空。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信