Improvement of the Calculation Standard for Prolongation cost of Domestic Public Construction Project

Kichang Jeong, Jae-Seob Lee
{"title":"Improvement of the Calculation Standard for Prolongation cost of Domestic Public Construction Project","authors":"Kichang Jeong, Jae-Seob Lee","doi":"10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.4.095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Recently, a research regarding calculation of construction time extension-oriented incidental costs has been intensively suggested in quantitative aspect and recent studies on system improvement has been made continuously. In the case of Domestic Public Construction Works, State Contract Act is applied when the client is government whereas Local Government Contract Act is done when the client is local government, but more meticulous study is required because improvement plan is not proposed even there is a clear demand for improvement of these problems on calculation standard. Thus this study suggested appropriate standard by comparing each the calculation standards followed by ‘State Contract Act’ and ‘Local Government Contract Act’, considering the problems accorded, and analyzing field cases. Calculation method of other expenses was differently regulated as the revision of each regulation, and this demonstrates that there is a difference of actual cost from 12.37% to 24.95%. It is shown that less cost of construction time were calculated than actual cost according to a problem of calculation method by State Contract Act as the rate at the time of contract to be applied in other expense rate. This study suggested the rate against incidental cost and the rate of other expense per day against total construction cost as an appropriate rate calculation for other expense based on field database.","PeriodicalId":220018,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.4.095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

: Recently, a research regarding calculation of construction time extension-oriented incidental costs has been intensively suggested in quantitative aspect and recent studies on system improvement has been made continuously. In the case of Domestic Public Construction Works, State Contract Act is applied when the client is government whereas Local Government Contract Act is done when the client is local government, but more meticulous study is required because improvement plan is not proposed even there is a clear demand for improvement of these problems on calculation standard. Thus this study suggested appropriate standard by comparing each the calculation standards followed by ‘State Contract Act’ and ‘Local Government Contract Act’, considering the problems accorded, and analyzing field cases. Calculation method of other expenses was differently regulated as the revision of each regulation, and this demonstrates that there is a difference of actual cost from 12.37% to 24.95%. It is shown that less cost of construction time were calculated than actual cost according to a problem of calculation method by State Contract Act as the rate at the time of contract to be applied in other expense rate. This study suggested the rate against incidental cost and the rate of other expense per day against total construction cost as an appropriate rate calculation for other expense based on field database.
国内公共建设工程延期造价计算标准的改进
近年来,以工期延长为导向的附带成本计算在定量方面的研究较多,系统改进方面的研究也在不断进行。对于国内公共建设工程,在发包方为政府时适用《国家合同法》,在发包方为地方政府时适用《地方政府合同法》,但这些问题在计算标准上有明确的改进要求,但并没有提出改进方案,需要进行更细致的研究。本文通过比较《国家合同法》和《地方政府合同法》的计算标准,结合存在的问题,并结合实际案例,提出了相应的计算标准。其他费用的计算方法随着各项法规的修订而有所不同,这说明实际成本从12.37%到24.95%之间存在差异。根据《国家合同法》规定的一个计算方法问题,将合同时费率应用于其他费率时,计算的施工时间成本低于实际成本。这项研究建议以附带费用的比率和每天其他费用的比率占总建筑费用的比率作为根据现场数据库计算其他费用的适当比率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信