Cluster analysis of top 200 universities in Mathematics

Kathiresan Gopal, Mahendran Shitan
{"title":"Cluster analysis of top 200 universities in Mathematics","authors":"Kathiresan Gopal, Mahendran Shitan","doi":"10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"University rankings are becoming a vital performance assessment for higher learning institutions worldwide. Besides the overall rankings, the universities are also ranked by subjects serving as comprehensive guide to discover the specialist strengths of universities worldwide by highlighting top 200 universities for a range of 30 individual popular subjects. Data for this ranking purpose consist four variables namely the academic reputation, employer reputation, citation per paper and H-index citations. In this ranking, universities are ranked according to their overall score calculated from linear combination of the aforementioned variables and their respective weightings. As the existing ranking technique based on overall score appears to be simple and since the rankings data are of multivariate nature, therefore it is possible to use multivariate statistical technique like cluster analysis. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis of top 200 QS ranked universities by Mathematics subject area 2014 has been performed to obtain natural clustering of the universities in an objective manner. The agreement between cluster analysis and existing QS rankings is verified and it is suggested that the distance between universities can be used as an alternative measure to rank universities. Cluster analysis applied on the same variables would serve as an alternative way to rank universities and to look at the rankings in a different perspective.","PeriodicalId":407600,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research (iSMSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

University rankings are becoming a vital performance assessment for higher learning institutions worldwide. Besides the overall rankings, the universities are also ranked by subjects serving as comprehensive guide to discover the specialist strengths of universities worldwide by highlighting top 200 universities for a range of 30 individual popular subjects. Data for this ranking purpose consist four variables namely the academic reputation, employer reputation, citation per paper and H-index citations. In this ranking, universities are ranked according to their overall score calculated from linear combination of the aforementioned variables and their respective weightings. As the existing ranking technique based on overall score appears to be simple and since the rankings data are of multivariate nature, therefore it is possible to use multivariate statistical technique like cluster analysis. Agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis of top 200 QS ranked universities by Mathematics subject area 2014 has been performed to obtain natural clustering of the universities in an objective manner. The agreement between cluster analysis and existing QS rankings is verified and it is suggested that the distance between universities can be used as an alternative measure to rank universities. Cluster analysis applied on the same variables would serve as an alternative way to rank universities and to look at the rankings in a different perspective.
数学专业排名前200名大学的聚类分析
大学排名正在成为世界各地高等教育机构的重要绩效评估。除了综合排名外,大学还按学科进行排名,通过突出30个热门学科的前200名,这是发现全球大学专业优势的综合指南。该排名的数据包括四个变量,即学术声誉、雇主声誉、论文被引次数和h指数被引次数。在这个排名中,大学是根据上述变量及其各自权重的线性组合计算出的总分来排名的。由于现有的基于总分的排名技术显得简单,而且排名数据具有多变量性质,因此可以使用聚类分析等多变量统计技术。对2014年QS排名前200名的大学数学学科领域进行聚类分析,客观地获得大学的自然聚类。验证了聚类分析与现有QS排名的一致性,并建议将大学之间的距离作为大学排名的替代指标。将聚类分析应用于相同的变量,可以作为大学排名的另一种方法,并从不同的角度看待排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信