Factors for assessing performance of lean concept application in hospital outpatient department

Napatsorn Inworn, R. Chompu-inwai
{"title":"Factors for assessing performance of lean concept application in hospital outpatient department","authors":"Napatsorn Inworn, R. Chompu-inwai","doi":"10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research study focused on an analysis of the critical factors employed when assessing the performance of Lean thinking in hospital outpatients departments (OPD), using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The study began by identifying those potential factors to be used in the assessment based on a review of the previous studies, the Hospital Accreditation, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, and SERVQUAL standards. Those potential factors were then classified based on four Balanced Scorecard perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth, so as to establish a research framework. A questionnaire was developed and used to prioritize these potential factors, divided into five sections, as follows: (1) primary data on the hospitals, (2) primary data on the respondents, (3) details of the potential factors and definitions of relevant terms, (4) a comparison of the factors in accordance with AHP, and (5) recommendations. The questionnaire consisted of 234 questions and was tested for validity by experts prior to being distributed to a sample group, one comprised of executives, supervisors and operating officers across three hospitals in Thailand. There were a total of eight respondents. The data from the questionnaires was analyzed using AHP to determine each factor weight. Then, Pareto analysis was used to prioritize and select those factors critical to the lean performance assessment. As a result, the research identified a total of 31 factors deemed critical in the assessment, all of which could be developed as an index or as guidelines to be used in the study's assessment of lean thinking, as applied at hospital OPD.","PeriodicalId":302732,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTMET.2015.7359024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research study focused on an analysis of the critical factors employed when assessing the performance of Lean thinking in hospital outpatients departments (OPD), using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The study began by identifying those potential factors to be used in the assessment based on a review of the previous studies, the Hospital Accreditation, Joint Commission International Accreditation Standards, the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, and SERVQUAL standards. Those potential factors were then classified based on four Balanced Scorecard perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth, so as to establish a research framework. A questionnaire was developed and used to prioritize these potential factors, divided into five sections, as follows: (1) primary data on the hospitals, (2) primary data on the respondents, (3) details of the potential factors and definitions of relevant terms, (4) a comparison of the factors in accordance with AHP, and (5) recommendations. The questionnaire consisted of 234 questions and was tested for validity by experts prior to being distributed to a sample group, one comprised of executives, supervisors and operating officers across three hospitals in Thailand. There were a total of eight respondents. The data from the questionnaires was analyzed using AHP to determine each factor weight. Then, Pareto analysis was used to prioritize and select those factors critical to the lean performance assessment. As a result, the research identified a total of 31 factors deemed critical in the assessment, all of which could be developed as an index or as guidelines to be used in the study's assessment of lean thinking, as applied at hospital OPD.
医院门诊部精益理念应用绩效评价因素分析
本研究主要利用层次分析法(AHP)分析医院门诊部(OPD)精益思维绩效评估的关键因素。这项研究首先根据对以前的研究、医院认证、联合委员会国际认证标准、马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖和SERVQUAL标准的审查,确定了评估中要使用的潜在因素。然后,根据平衡计分卡的四个角度对这些潜在因素进行分类:财务、客户、内部流程和学习与成长,从而建立一个研究框架。我们编制了一份调查问卷,对这些潜在因素进行了排序,分为五个部分,如下:(1)医院的主要数据,(2)受访者的主要数据,(3)潜在因素的详细信息和相关术语的定义,(4)根据AHP对因素进行比较,(5)建议。该问卷由234个问题组成,在分发给一个样本组之前,由专家进行了有效性测试,其中一个样本组由泰国三家医院的高管、主管和运营人员组成。共有8位受访者。采用层次分析法对问卷数据进行分析,确定各因素权重。然后,利用帕累托分析对精益绩效评估的关键因素进行优先排序和选择。结果,研究共确定了31个在评估中被认为是关键的因素,所有这些因素都可以作为指标或指南,用于研究对精益思维的评估,并应用于医院的门诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信