Has the Reform of the Public-Benefit Direct Payment Improved the Inequality?

Jongin Kim
{"title":"Has the Reform of the Public-Benefit Direct Payment Improved the Inequality?","authors":"Jongin Kim","doi":"10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.4.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Direct Payment Policy on the Rice Acreage played an important role in ensuring the stable production of rice. However, it was pointed out that the policy causes an oversupply of rice has been continuously raised. In addition, a problem was raised that the policy worked in favor of large scale farmers. Accordingly, the government introduced a new public-benefit direct payment system in 2020, which was designed so that the direct payment system was not linked to cultivation, and the payment unit price was also designed to decrease as the area increased. As a result of comparing the effects of the reorganization of the direct payment system, the proportion of direct payments paid to the dry field in the past was only 14.5%, but increased to 28.3% in 2020. Thus, the rice-oriented support structure was improved. On the other hand, the ratio of mean to median (RHS), fell from around 2.2 to 1.69, confirming that the gap between farm households improved significantly. In addition, the Gini coefficient was also lowered to 0.46 from the level at the beginning of 0.6, indicating that the distribution equity was improved.","PeriodicalId":395795,"journal":{"name":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.4.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Direct Payment Policy on the Rice Acreage played an important role in ensuring the stable production of rice. However, it was pointed out that the policy causes an oversupply of rice has been continuously raised. In addition, a problem was raised that the policy worked in favor of large scale farmers. Accordingly, the government introduced a new public-benefit direct payment system in 2020, which was designed so that the direct payment system was not linked to cultivation, and the payment unit price was also designed to decrease as the area increased. As a result of comparing the effects of the reorganization of the direct payment system, the proportion of direct payments paid to the dry field in the past was only 14.5%, but increased to 28.3% in 2020. Thus, the rice-oriented support structure was improved. On the other hand, the ratio of mean to median (RHS), fell from around 2.2 to 1.69, confirming that the gap between farm households improved significantly. In addition, the Gini coefficient was also lowered to 0.46 from the level at the beginning of 0.6, indicating that the distribution equity was improved.
公益直接支付改革是否改善了不平等?
水稻种植面积直接支付政策在保证水稻稳定生产方面发挥了重要作用。然而,有人指出,该政策导致大米供过于求的现象一直在不断加剧。此外,有人提出了一个问题,即该政策对大规模农民有利。因此,政府在2020年推出了新的公益直接支付制度,其设计是直接支付制度与种植不挂钩,支付单价也被设计为随着面积的增加而降低。通过对直接支付体系重组效果的对比,过去旱田直接支付比例仅为14.5%,到2020年增加到28.3%。从而改进了以水稻为导向的支撑结构。另一方面,平均与中位数之比(RHS)从2.2左右下降到1.69,证实农户之间的差距显著改善。此外,基尼系数也从最初的0.6下降到0.46,说明分配公平得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信