The Reliability and Validity Study of the Eating-related Intrusive Thoughts Inventory (INPIAS)

{"title":"The Reliability and Validity Study of the Eating-related Intrusive Thoughts Inventory (INPIAS)","authors":"","doi":"10.7816/nesne-10-25-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intrusive thoughts (ITs) have been addressed with a transdiagnostic conceptualization recently. The Eating-related Intrusive Thoughts Inventory (INPIAS), composed of eating-related ITs (Part 1), consequences of interference (Part 2A) and control strategies (Part 2B) of ITs, was developed to examine ITs in Eating Disorders (EDs). The Turkish adaptation of INPIAS via reliability and validity analyses was conducted in this study. The sample consisted of 339 university students. INPIAS and Eating Disorder Examination Scale and Body Image Scale (for concurrent validity), Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised Form, Beck Anxiety Scale and Beck Depression Scale (for convergent validity) and the Demographics Form were used. Results revealed that the five-factor solution from the exploratory factor analysis (Part 1) and the original factor structures (Part 2A and Part 2B) showed a better fit. INPIAS had positive correlations with other scales. The reliability scores revealed Cronbach alpha values of .98 (Part 1), .92 (Part 2A), and .89 (Part 2B) and test-retest correlations of .98 (Part 1), .93 (Part 2A), and .92 (Part 2B). So, INPIAS may be utilized to examine ITs related to eating, diet, body image, exercise, and related control strategies. INPIAS is assumed to enlighten future studies about the relationship between ITs and EDs.","PeriodicalId":262181,"journal":{"name":"Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-25-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intrusive thoughts (ITs) have been addressed with a transdiagnostic conceptualization recently. The Eating-related Intrusive Thoughts Inventory (INPIAS), composed of eating-related ITs (Part 1), consequences of interference (Part 2A) and control strategies (Part 2B) of ITs, was developed to examine ITs in Eating Disorders (EDs). The Turkish adaptation of INPIAS via reliability and validity analyses was conducted in this study. The sample consisted of 339 university students. INPIAS and Eating Disorder Examination Scale and Body Image Scale (for concurrent validity), Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised Form, Beck Anxiety Scale and Beck Depression Scale (for convergent validity) and the Demographics Form were used. Results revealed that the five-factor solution from the exploratory factor analysis (Part 1) and the original factor structures (Part 2A and Part 2B) showed a better fit. INPIAS had positive correlations with other scales. The reliability scores revealed Cronbach alpha values of .98 (Part 1), .92 (Part 2A), and .89 (Part 2B) and test-retest correlations of .98 (Part 1), .93 (Part 2A), and .92 (Part 2B). So, INPIAS may be utilized to examine ITs related to eating, diet, body image, exercise, and related control strategies. INPIAS is assumed to enlighten future studies about the relationship between ITs and EDs.
进食相关侵入性思维量表(INPIAS)信效度研究
侵入性思维(ITs)最近已被解决了一个跨诊断的概念。进食相关干扰思维量表(INPIAS)由进食相关干扰思维(Part 1)、干扰后果(Part 2A)和控制策略(Part 2B)组成,旨在研究进食障碍(EDs)患者的进食相关干扰思维。本研究通过信度和效度分析对INPIAS的土耳其适应性进行了分析。样本由339名大学生组成。采用INPIAS、饮食失调检查量表和身体形象量表(并行效度)、强迫量表修订表、贝克焦虑量表和贝克抑郁量表(收敛效度)和人口统计学量表。结果表明,探索性因子分析(Part 1)得到的五因子解与原因子结构(Part 2A和Part 2B)拟合较好。INPIAS与其他量表呈正相关。信度得分显示Cronbach alpha值为0.98 (Part 1)、0.92 (Part 2A)和0.89 (Part 2B),重测相关性为0.98 (Part 1)、0.93 (Part 2A)和0.92 (Part 2B)。因此,INPIAS可以用来检查ITs与饮食,饮食,身体形象,运动和相关的控制策略。INPIAS被认为对未来研究ITs与EDs之间的关系具有启发意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信