The Big Deal Is Dead! Long Live The Big Deal!

James A. Galbraith, Stephanie P. Hess
{"title":"The Big Deal Is Dead! Long Live The Big Deal!","authors":"James A. Galbraith, Stephanie P. Hess","doi":"10.5703/1288284317208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries, the proclamation \"The king is dead, long live the\n king\" heralds the demise of the old monarch and the accession of a new one. This\n tradition ensures that the throne never remains empty while facilitating a smooth\n transition of power. When the \"Big Deal\" journal subscription model debuted in\n 1996, few suspected the extent to which academic libraries would come to rely upon it,\n or that it would become the primary channel by which academic libraries procure academic\n journal content. As budget cuts take their toll on libraries, the demise of the Big Deal\n model seems inevitable as the true value of all-inclusive packages becomes less evident.\n But is it? Collection analysis reveals that many titles included within these Big Deal\n packages remain unused or underutilized, significantly decreasing the overall value of\n serial subscription packages. SPARC's Big Deal Cancellation Tracker shows an increasing\n number of libraries and consortia forgoing this model in favor of regaining local\n control over their collections and budgets. Binghamton University Libraries is no\n exception. Recent curriculum changes and financial developments have prompted us to\n adopt an ongoing evaluation of our users' information needs and proactively negotiate\n and cancel deals in order to better serve our constituents. This session described our\n fact finding, workflow modifications, and data analysis processes as well as the\n outcomes of our adventures in pursuing and planning for the cancellation of Big Deal\n agreements based on local collection development priorities and serials budget\n realities.","PeriodicalId":287918,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","volume":"90 30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In many countries, the proclamation "The king is dead, long live the king" heralds the demise of the old monarch and the accession of a new one. This tradition ensures that the throne never remains empty while facilitating a smooth transition of power. When the "Big Deal" journal subscription model debuted in 1996, few suspected the extent to which academic libraries would come to rely upon it, or that it would become the primary channel by which academic libraries procure academic journal content. As budget cuts take their toll on libraries, the demise of the Big Deal model seems inevitable as the true value of all-inclusive packages becomes less evident. But is it? Collection analysis reveals that many titles included within these Big Deal packages remain unused or underutilized, significantly decreasing the overall value of serial subscription packages. SPARC's Big Deal Cancellation Tracker shows an increasing number of libraries and consortia forgoing this model in favor of regaining local control over their collections and budgets. Binghamton University Libraries is no exception. Recent curriculum changes and financial developments have prompted us to adopt an ongoing evaluation of our users' information needs and proactively negotiate and cancel deals in order to better serve our constituents. This session described our fact finding, workflow modifications, and data analysis processes as well as the outcomes of our adventures in pursuing and planning for the cancellation of Big Deal agreements based on local collection development priorities and serials budget realities.
大交易已死!大交易万岁!
在许多国家,“国王驾崩,国王万岁”的宣告预示着旧君主的逝世和新君主的登基。这一传统确保了王位永远不会空着,同时促进了权力的顺利过渡。当1996年“大交易”期刊订阅模式首次出现时,很少有人怀疑学术图书馆会依赖它的程度,或者它会成为学术图书馆获取学术期刊内容的主要渠道。随着预算削减对图书馆造成影响,“大交易”模式的消亡似乎不可避免,因为包罗万象的套餐的真正价值变得不那么明显。但这是真的吗?收集分析显示,这些Big Deal包中包含的许多标题仍然未使用或未充分利用,这大大降低了串行订阅包的总体价值。SPARC的大交易取消跟踪显示,越来越多的图书馆和协会放弃了这种模式,转而支持重新获得本地对其馆藏和预算的控制。宾厄姆顿大学图书馆也不例外。最近的课程变化和财务发展促使我们对用户的信息需求进行持续评估,并积极谈判和取消交易,以便更好地为我们的选民服务。本次会议描述了我们的事实发现、工作流程修改和数据分析过程,以及我们在根据本地收藏开发优先级和系列预算现实情况寻求和计划取消大交易协议的冒险结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信