Understanding the association between reappraisal use and depressive symptoms during adolescence: the moderating influence of regulatory success

Kalee De France, Owen Hicks, Tom Hollenstein
{"title":"Understanding the association between reappraisal use and depressive symptoms during adolescence: the moderating influence of regulatory success","authors":"Kalee De France, Owen Hicks, Tom Hollenstein","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2022.2043245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Higher levels of reliance on cognitive reappraisal to manage daily emotional events are commonly associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms. However, reappraisal is a cognitively demanding regulation strategy, and its efficacy may depend on how successfully an individual is able to employ it. Individual differences in the association between reappraisal use and depressive symptoms may be particularly evident during adolescence, when the cognitive skills required to implement this complex strategy are still in development. The current study sought to determine whether the association between reappraisal use and subsequent depressive symptom development is contingent on perceived regulatory success when using reappraisal. At Wave 1, adolescents (n =  178, mean age = 13.92, 49.7% female) used an experience-sampling smartphone app to report on their reappraisal use and perceptions of regulatory success over the course of two weeks. Six, 12, and 18 months later, adolescents completed a self-report measure of their depressive symptoms. Results showed that a) reappraisal use was associated with both subsequent depressive symptoms and trajectories of depressive symptoms over time, b) these associations were moderated by perceptions of regulatory success. Higher levels of reappraisal use were associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms only for those who reported higher than average between-subject regulatory success when reappraisal was enacted.","PeriodicalId":128345,"journal":{"name":"Cognition and Emotion","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition and Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2043245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Higher levels of reliance on cognitive reappraisal to manage daily emotional events are commonly associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms. However, reappraisal is a cognitively demanding regulation strategy, and its efficacy may depend on how successfully an individual is able to employ it. Individual differences in the association between reappraisal use and depressive symptoms may be particularly evident during adolescence, when the cognitive skills required to implement this complex strategy are still in development. The current study sought to determine whether the association between reappraisal use and subsequent depressive symptom development is contingent on perceived regulatory success when using reappraisal. At Wave 1, adolescents (n =  178, mean age = 13.92, 49.7% female) used an experience-sampling smartphone app to report on their reappraisal use and perceptions of regulatory success over the course of two weeks. Six, 12, and 18 months later, adolescents completed a self-report measure of their depressive symptoms. Results showed that a) reappraisal use was associated with both subsequent depressive symptoms and trajectories of depressive symptoms over time, b) these associations were moderated by perceptions of regulatory success. Higher levels of reappraisal use were associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms only for those who reported higher than average between-subject regulatory success when reappraisal was enacted.
理解青春期重评价使用与抑郁症状之间的关系:调节成功的调节作用
高度依赖认知重评价来管理日常情绪事件通常与较低程度的抑郁症状相关。然而,重新评估是一种认知要求的调节策略,其有效性可能取决于个人能够成功地使用它。在青少年时期,当实施这一复杂策略所需的认知技能仍处于发展阶段时,重新评价使用与抑郁症状之间的关联的个体差异可能尤其明显。目前的研究试图确定重新评估的使用与随后的抑郁症状发展之间的关联是否取决于使用重新评估时感知到的调节成功。在第一阶段,青少年(n = 178,平均年龄= 13.92,其中49.7%为女性)使用一款体验抽样智能手机应用程序报告他们在两周内对监管成功的重新评估使用情况和看法。6个月、12个月和18个月后,青少年完成了对抑郁症状的自我报告。结果表明:a)重新评估使用与随后的抑郁症状和抑郁症状随时间的发展轨迹相关;b)这些关联被调节成功的感知所缓和。较高水平的重新评估使用与较低水平的抑郁症状相关,仅适用于那些在实施重新评估时报告的受试者间调节成功率高于平均水平的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信